Game #68 Preview – I Have a Plan!!!

by Tim Donahue on March 17, 2010 at 5:06 pm

Indiana Pacers @ Cleveland Cavaliers
Wednesday, March 17th
7:00 pm EST
Quicken Loans Arena
Cleveland, Ohio

Quick.  Can somebody get me the phone number for (a) the owner of the Cleveland Browns and (b) a speedy delivery service that can get a package to the Cavs locker room immediately?

No?

Well, what’s that leave us?

Let’s see…Danny has given LeBron a challenge,  occasionally.  Maybe he can…Oh…Right.  So with Danny out, well… I’m having trouble going any further down that path without visions of LeBron being guarded by Mike Dunleavy or Luther Head, so we’ll just look elsewhere.

Pound it into Roy?  OK…two games vs. Cleveland, Roy’s averaged 4 points, 3 rebounds, and 5.5 fouls in just over 20 minutes a night.

So, if you can’t go through Danny, and you can’t go through Roy, your next best option on this team is…

is…

is…

OK.  Let’s use the emergency backup plan.

jameson bottle

If you’re not driving, I’d start now.  And none of that Protestant Bushmill’s.


{ 5 comments }

Game #67 Recap – A Win and a Loss

by Tim Donahue on March 17, 2010 at 3:24 pm

Indiana Pacers 99 – Charlotte Bobcats 94

————–

The Win

Larry Brown is an odd duck.  He is a continually miserable genius, often capable of coaxing amazing performances out of pedestrian rosters.  Given a strong roster, as he was in Detroit, he can win it all for you.  His resume since Detroit has been a bit spotty, but this year’s Bobcats have been showing signs of being one of those ugly, but dangerous teams nobody wants in the playoffs.  The Bobcats came into Conseco Fieldhouse owners of a six-game winning streak and the 6th seed in the Eastern Conference Playoffs.

However, there are nights with Larry Brown-teams where all of the warts of the roster are on full and glorious display.  On these nights, his teams are, quite simply, bad.  Last night was one of those nights.

On Sunday, Charlotte went into Orlando and led almost the entire second half on their way to defeating the Magic, 96-89.  Last night, they fell behind in the second quarter and really didn’t mount anything resembling a challenge until a 9-point run late in the fourth.  This run gave them the ball and a chance to tie the game with less than 30 seconds left, but that chance was snuffed when Troy Murphy read Boris Diaw’s telegram and picked off a pass in the lane.  A.J. Price hit two freebies to ice the victory.

Some Notes:

  • Danny Granger played relatively well last night, despite shooting only 9-for-25 and committing 5 turnovers.  He nailed back-to-back threes in the fourth that provided enough cushion for the Pacers to cling to the victory.  He also grabbed 8 boards.  Unfortunately, as you all know, Danny wasn’t there at the end of the game – at least figuratively.  More on this in a bit.
  • A.J. Price got 20 minutes last night, back in the rotation due to T.J. Ford’s groin injury.  He certainly played pretty well, but God only knows whether he’ll be able to hold on to his spot when Ford returns.  He’ll have at least one more shot (tonight), and maybe as many as three before T.J. is projected to return.  On the things-looking-up front, O’Brien used him at point guard the entire time he was on the floor, even when Watson came in for the last few minutes.
  • Some of last night was about what might have been, had a rumored trade with Charlotte not fallen through at the deadline.   The deal (reportedly) would have sent T. J. Ford and Brandon Rush to Charlotte and brought back D.J. Augustin, Gerald Henderson, and Nazr Mohammed.  Both Ford and Mohammed missed last night’s game with injuries, but the other three principles played.
    • Gerald Henderson looked athletic, aggressive, and a little lost in his 10 minutes.  He scored 3 points (all at the line) while turning the ball over twice.  In his first stint, he blew past Dunleavy (no big deal) and got fouled at the rim, but other than that, he was a non-factor.
    • Yesterday on Pacer’s Digest, D.J. Augustin was described by one poster as “hot garbage.”  It is my understanding that hot garbage has filed a formal complaint for defamation of character.  D.J. Augustin was absolutely horrible last night.  He was mostly matched up with Price, and seemed completely unable to get around him.  I’d love to say that it was devastating defense by A.J., but mostly it just looked like Augustin was indecisive and timid.  He got in the lane a couple times, but was completely swallowed up.  It was some of the worst point guard play I’ve seen this year – and I’ve been watching the Pacers for 67 games.
    • Brandon Rush decided to treat us to his rendition of “It’s the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown.”  He had five fouls in 21 minutes of play and was generally non-existent at both ends.

The Loss

Well, they say a picture is worth a thousand words.

Dazedandconfused

TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and condition of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: 2010 NBAE (Photo by Ron Hoskins/NBAE via Getty Images)

You know the story by now, but the good news is that the Indianapolis Star is reporting he was released from the hospital, and all the test were  clear.   Danny won’t be available for tonight’s game at Cleveland, and it remains to be seen when he’ll return.  Head injuries are not trifling issues, so I’m hopeful Danny, the Pacers, and the medical staff exercise every precaution.

{ 1 comment }

Over on NBA Playbook, Sebastian Pruiti broke down a key play from late in Indiana’s loss to Milwaukee yesterday. Honestly, when a team that has won 11 of its last 12 games has a home date with the Pacers, the real “game clinching” play is probably the opening tip, but Sebastian does give us a nice look at how the Bucks pounded the final nail into the coffin.

Here’s the set-up:

When the Bucks entered the fourth quarter against the Pacers, it looked like it was going to be an easy 12 minutes.  The Bucks were leading by 14 at the start of the fourth, and have only allowed 62 points to the Pacers.  However, the Pacers decided to make things interesting in the fourth quarter.  In fact, with 2:19 left a Solomon Jones dunk made the score 90-94, cutting the lead to 4 points.  The Bucks were reeling and they needed a bucket to try and put the game away.

Sebastian then shows exactly what happened in full detail, but the gist is that Solomon Jones and Brandon Rush collectively misread/mishandled a simple up-screen from John Salmons that freed Andrew Bogut for a wide-open bucket at the rim.

Rush, by an large, is a pretty good defender — especially by this roster’s standards. He guards his man rather well when he has the ball and, as we saw in the Laker game during the last West Coast trip, he definitely has the chops to slow down even elite scorers.

But he still does slip up on a lot of the more nuanced stuff. He doesn’t fight through screens consistently and often gets caught napping or just out of position. Veterans are all too often able to find free space while he is guarding them by employing some relatively run-of-the-mill cuts. Sometimes, they don’t even need a screen to get open for a good look.

Of course, this probably isn’t the best representation of Brandon failing in this regard — Solomon simply cannot allow a guy like Bogut to get that much separation so close to the hoop. Most of this bucket is probably on Mr. Jones. Still, Brandon is too often involved in multi-player defensive break downs like this, and his defensive development is not going to progress much beyond where it currently is if he cannot make better off-the-ball decisions/reads.

He seems to have all the foot speed, strength and soft skills to learn how to do everything on the defensive end better. He looks like he may have the potential to be a key perimeter presence in a very good defense some day. That, combined with his shooting and his ability to get to the hoop on occasion is what made a lot of Indy fans glad that the rumored deadline deal with the Bobcats never happened.

The rest of this year and the 2010-11 season will be all about him putting it all together.

{ 1 comment }

Last night, the documentary Winning Time: Reggie Miller vs. The New York Knicks premiered on ESPN. And it is wonderful. Based on all the reactions I have heard, you don’t even have to be a Pacers fan to enjoy this one. I mean, some Knicks fans even dug it. (You can check out some more background on the movie here.)

If I had been the director, however, it wouldn’t have even been Winning Time. No, the title definitely would have been “Man, Did This Dude Just Did This?”

This is the exact phrase that John Starks used to describe what was going through his mind after Reggie hit the back-to-back threes that made up 75% of his infamous 8 points in 8.9 seconds outburst in 1995, which, if you’re new around these parts, is the very same sequence for which this blog is named.

Mostly, I would call it “Man, Did Dude Just Did This?” to highlight the true source of greatness for this flick: the interviews. Director Dan Klores spoke with most of the principals from the 1990s Pacers/Knicks rivalry and got some stellar content. But more than just running a camera to record people talking and calling that good, he expertly weaved the comments together to create a fantastic, patch-work, uninterrupted narrative from many different voices that perfectly describes everything the viewer needs to know.

For someone such as myself who knew 90% of the material going in, it is the craftsmanship displayed in this regard that is both the most impressive and the most entertaining part of the documentary.

Insight. Humor. Stage-setting. It’s all there. And there’s so much of it.

Thus, here are my favorite 46 quotes from Winning Time, including the wonderfully grammatically challenged one that could have made this thing a John Starks joint.

reggie_knicks

On Reggie

Pacers play-by-play announcer Mark Boyle: “The first time I saw him, I was taken aback. The guy looked like Mr. Potato Head on a stick.”

Cheryl Miller: “He’s maddening. He is a maddening human being.”

Patrick Ewing: “He was a great con man. Ya know, he was always crying to the ref, running off, flopping. Ya know, knock you down, smack you and act like he was the one getting smacked. I … ya know … tell ya … I hated Reggie.”

Reggie Miller: “Seventy percent of me talking on the court is personally for me to get me motivated and going. Thirty percent is to see if I can get into the opponent’s head.”

On Cheryl Miller

Reggie Miller: “Cheryl was the king of the block — and that was over the guys and the girls. She jumped the highest. She played the hardest. And she hit the hardest.”

Reggie Miller: “I learned a lot form the beat downs. Cheryl’s tough. Very tough.”

Cheryl Miller: “I would kill him. I loved killing Reggie. And dad would come out ‘Don’t hit your brother’ and all that kind of stuff. But he was … just … that … annoying.”

Cheryl Miller: “I was physically bigger and better than him. So every time that he would come in the middle, I would send it back. And I would laugh about him and give him a hard time and say ‘Alright. Alright, you sissy. This is where the big girls play.’”

On the John Starks Head Butt (Game 3, 1993)

Reggie: “Looking at Oakley, I was like ‘Your boy is really, really dumb. I mean he is really, really dumb. Are you serious?’”

Antonio Davis: “I’m surprised he didn’t have, like, a pack of ketchup and just put it up to his head, and you look and you think he’s bleeding.”

Reggie Miller: “I don’t talk trash. I keep telling you that. I’m a good guy.”

On the Rivalry’s Physicality

Antonio Davis: “Against the Indiana Pacers, you wasn’t coming down the middle. If you came down once, you definitely knew you couldn’t come down again.”

Greg Anthony: “We would say, ‘Hey, we’re gonna win something tonight. We’re either gonna win the game or the fight.’”

Patrick Ewing: “If we knocked someone down, it was a fine to pick them back up.”

On the 25-point Fourth Quarter (Game 5, 1994)

Mark Boyle: “The Knicks were a really strong defensive team. And they had a nice lead going into the fourth quarter. And, you thought it was over.”

Reggie (on Spike): “You pay a lot of money for those seats … OK, you’re gonna be part of the game now … He became part of the game.”

Spike Lee: “I had never ever had any interplay with an athlete before like that. Ever.” *cut to footage of Spike and Scottie Pippen getting into it*

Ahmad Rashad (on Spike): “If you go to playgrounds across the country, there’s always one little guy who can’t play very well, but he stands over there and talks all the crap. He’s the instigator.”

Spike Lee: “I didn’t mind the choke sign, but to grab his nuts. My wife’s sitting right there. C’mon.”

Reggie Miller: “I remember going to the Davis boys and Rik and saying ‘You guys just set screens. I’m gonna make everything.’”

Herb Williams: “I think if Spike had of just sat there and not said nothing, Reggie might have missed his next ten shots.”

Marv Albert: “He had two games going. He had one with Spike. And he had one with the Knicks.”

Larry Brown: “I think as soon as he got over half court, he was in range.”

Spike Lee (on the following game, Game 6): “I’m praying to God, because I know, we lose this game, it’s gonna be hard for me to live in New York City.”

On 8 points in 8.9 Seconds (Game 1, 1995)

Donnie Walsh: “Mel Daniels started banging on the door, and he said ‘Donnie, Reggie just tied the game up.’ And I said ‘Stop screwing with me — I’m not in the mood.’”

Ahmad Rashad: “…presence of mind to not take the two — to step back and take the three. Now that takes … huge … … balls … to do that.”

John Starks: “I’m walking to the free-throw line and I’m thinking, like, ‘Man, did this dude just did this?’”

Greg Anthony: “I had never heard the Garden that quiet. We’ve had shootarounds at the Garden when there was no one there but the janitors, and it wasn’t that quiet.”

Mark Jackson: “We watched John’s eyes. And he wanted no parts of those foul shots.”

Spike Lee (on Anthony Mason fouling Reggie): “Our basketball IQ is not the highest.”

Jeff Van Gundy: “That sequence was the biggest meltdown that I can remember ever seeing in the NBA.”

Reggie Miller: “The joy of them choking, and that satisfaction of doing it in New York? John missing two free-throws at home? That’s the joy of it.

On Ding Dong, the Witch Is Dead (Game 7, 1995)

Antonio Davis: “It’s the Garden. It’s New York. You’re just so fired up. You can’t sleep. You can’t eat. You just wanna play.”

Byron Scott: “Rik Smits hadn’t said anything for six games, and we got in our huddle, and Rik Smits said ‘Let’s go out and kick their ass.’ That was it. We was like, ‘Ahh, it’s on.’”

Cheryl Miller: “Going back to New York, no way they win it. I thought it was done. I thought it was over.”

Peter Vecsey: “It was gonna be done again and it was gonna be done in Madison Square Garden … Manifest Destiny.”

Ahmad Rashad: “The whole city of New York was involved. Patrick Ewing. Reggie Miller. The Knicks. The Pacers, their arch-rivals. And it was their peak — their chance. And it hinged on one play.”

Rik Smits: “I’m thinking ‘Wow. The same thing is happening over again. We’re gonna lose.’”

Patrick Ewing (on his failed finger roll): “I see the ball hit — Ba-dupe … Ba-dupe.”

Charles Smith: “That shot put the lid on the basket for all of our careers moving forward.”

Mark Boyle: “Ding dong the witch is dead.”

On Other Stuff

Peter Vecsey: “We used to call it Nap City — probably still is called Nap City — because most players, when they get there, they do go to sleep and wait for the game.”

Spike Lee: “The first season tickets I had, I got the day after we got Patrick Ewing in the Draft.”

Reggie Miller: “Larry Brown is a perfectionist in an imperfect game. You always hear him say ‘Play the Right Way.’ During it? You couldn’t stand him. We all couldn’t stand him. But, in a sense, he was bringing us closer together as a team, because we were all ‘Hey, we can’t stand the coach, but we got to do the right thing.’”

Cheryl Miller: “I didn’t even know Indiana had an NBA team. I didn’t even know they had a franchise.”

Mark Jackson (on being traded from the Clippers the Pacers): “That’s probably the first time somebody was thrilled to move from LA to Indiana.”

Some young, unidentified Pacers fan: “I shaved my head. And … painted it.”

pacers ticket holder

{ 6 comments }

Unfortunately, the game this afternoon against the Bucks was not shown on League Pass, and I missed it. Milwaukee is playing great of late so I was pretty excited for this one, too. But it was at least nice to see that Danny got to the line 11 times (making all 11) and AJ Price took more shots (7 FGA) than he has since February 6. Looks like the 32-point fourth quarter was a nice effort as well.

Oh well.

But that’s the last I will discuss that game.

Because, as we all know, one more meaningless loss in an almost-entirely meaningless season is not even close to the biggest thing going on in Pacers Universe today. Nope, that would be the broadcast premiere of Winning Time: Reggie Miller vs. The New York Knicks tonight at 9:00 pm (EST) on ESPN.

By all accounts, this is one of the best films in the 30 For 30 series, and I haven’t heard a bad word about it yet. Tim went to the media premiere six weeks ago and had this to say:

By the time the documentary reaches the moment for which this site is named, even those who dislike the NBA will be pretty engaged in the drama of the rivalry.

And for those of us who feel as though we lived through those battles as soldiers in the fight rather than just passive onlookers, it provides so much more. It is both a reminder of the days when “Pacer Pride” actually meant something and a look behind the curtain.  Even though the Pacers/Knicks battles of the 90s are almost part of my DNA (and I still have the scar from the headbutt Starks gave Reggie to prove it), Klores still was able to provide vignettes that were new to me.

I suggest reading the rest of Tim’s account. And he focuses on what being a Pacer fan means more so than the movie itself, so nothing will really be spoiled.

Dan Devine also has a nice break-down over on Ball Don’t Lie, which while very good to read, is a little more spoiler-y if you care about those sorts of things.

Here’s a (safe) excerpt of that:

There’s a lot of smiling in the early stages of “Winning Time: Reggie Miller vs. The New York Knicks.” A curious amount, given how much vitriol coursed through the rivalry between the Knicks and Miller’s Indiana Pacers back in the mid-1990s. Frankly, it’s a bit off-putting.

See, many intense, angry, tough men played on these two basketball teams, and they did not like each other. (These men were joined by New York Knicks forward Charles Smith, who has been called “The Brick Hithouse” and is also known as “The Southern Dandy.”) They battled. They cursed and fought. They tirelessly traded hard fouls, back when hard fouls were actually hard fouls. They so, so did not like each other.

And yet there’s John Starks, smiling as he talks about his experiences with Miller’s ceaseless trash talk. There’s Patrick Ewing, smirking while recounting Miller’s flair for flopping and complaining to officials.

There’s Antonio Davis, beaming as he tells how he couldn’t wait “to go and ring this guy’s bell, ring that guy’s bell,” provided This Guy or That Guy dared to drive the lane while wearing orange and blue. There’s then-Knicks General Manager Ernie Grunfeld, laughing while recalling Starks’ suspension-inducing headbutt of Miller during Game 3 of the first round of the 1993 Eastern Conference Semifinals.

ESPN itself has added a third good look at the film in the video below.

And they actually added an interesting segment on at the end that reveals a fact I had never known: KG’s ritual of swatting away all after-the-whistle shots to hit the rim started because of Reggie.

Garnett’s whole practice/superstition of Garnett goaltending shots after the whistle is pretty silly. I’m actually surprised I have never seen him mess it up by mishearing a whistle and giving the other team two — or even three — free points. Nonetheless, it’s an odd, trivial signature thing that some fans can enjoy in the same vein as the Dikembe finger wave. Ultimately, yeah, it’s innocuous and pointless. But it’s still sorta neat.

And, more relevant to Pacers nation, it’s just one more example of how Reggie was able to get under someone’s skin. We all know how he got to Spike and Starks and will fortunately get to watch that beautiful history re-told tonight.

But now, we see how he got to Garnett, too.

Video via @Jose3030.

{ 4 comments }

Indiana Pacers @ Milwaukee Bucks
Sunday, March 14th
1:00 pm EST
Bradley Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

In the midst wandering aimlessly around the internet yesterday, I came across this tweet:

Which apparently I can’t show you, because twitter is down right now.  I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s protesting the fact that those bastages stole an hour from us today.  I don’t know who “those bastages” are, but I hate ‘em.  For approaching 40 years of my life, I never had to change the time on all the clocks in my house.  Now, I have to do it twice a year while some nimrod tells me it’s easier.  I love that almost as much as having to wait until midnight to set off fireworks on the Fourth so that it’s dark enough.

You do realize that the Pacers haven’t made the playoffs since we first started to have this bi-annual ritual of stupidity?  Coincidence?  I think not.

In any case, had I been able to quote the tweet, you wouldn’t have been subjected to the preceding, and you would have seen that neither the Pacers nor the Bucks were televising the game today.  The tweet also mentioned that the NBA had informed whoever had tweeted it (I don’t remember, it was a retweet from somebody I don’t follow) that this would be the last NBA game to be not televised.  I guess next year, they’ll change the rules to require that at least one of the two teams televise every game.

Of course, that does little good to the thousands of Bucks fans and dozens of Pacer fans who would like to watch today’s game on TV.  This happened to the Pacers one other time this season.  Neither the Pacers, nor the T-Puppies, elected to televise the January 8th game at Minnesota.  The NBA did a workaround on League Pass Broadband by streaming the arena’s closed circuit feed with the Minnesota radio broadcast as audio.  This was OK, as long as you don’t mind “Brick” graphics or Advertising while players are shooting Free Throws, or large portions of the game being viewed from roughly the same vantage point as the dust mop used by the ball boys.

I’m not sure if they’ll do this today, but if not, then you can listen to the best in the business, Mark & Slick, on 1070 the fan or over the internet by becoming an NBA All-Access Member (it’s free).

In any case, today’s game is an excellent opportunity for the Pacers to notch their 27th double digit loss of the season.  (As I typed that, I just realized that the Pacers have more double digit losses (26) than wins (21).  And the beat goes on…)  (Well, crap.  Now I have that gawdawful Sonny & Cher song stuck in my head.)  They’ve lost two close ones to the Bucks in Conseco, but fell by a dozen in Milwaukee at the end of February.

A month or so ago, everybody was looking at Charlotte as the surprise team in the East that no one would want to play in the playoffs.  Well, Charlotte stumbled out of the All Star break, and, despite their current five-game winning streak, have been surpassed by the Bucks as the Eastern Conference team on the rise.

Milwaukee is 11-2 since the All Star break.  More impressively, since dropping seven games below .500 on January 26th, they’ve won 17 of their 21 games to catapult themselves all the way up the the fifth seed.    The Bucks are 3rd in Defensive Rating, and 8th in Defensive eFG%, and 2nd in DefRB%, and the Pacers’ weaknesses will feed right into those items.

Andrew Bogut has pretty much destroyed the blue and gold this year, averaging 22 & 12 while shooting 70%.  O’Brien went small in the last game, and Bogut only got 15 and 10 (I guess that’s a little better), but the Pacers still lost.  I would expect to see Roy back in the starting lineup today, and McRoberts getting some burn off the bench.

At last notice, T.J. Ford was doubtful for today’s game.  I’d expect to see Earl Watson back in the starting lineup, with A.J. Price backing him up.  The last time the Pacers played in Milwaukee, A.J. Price got the start with Earl Watson out for personal reasons.  Price suffered a concussion in the game, and T.J. Ford came off the bench to score 20.  Then, much to the chagrin of Pacer fans everywhere, T.J. replaced A.J. in the rotation.  The over/under on number of times that Mark and Slick say that they wish they could see A.J. play more today is set at five.  I’d take the over.

Finally, when if the Pacers lose today, it will be the first time in 28 years that the Bucks have swept the Pacers in a season series.  Well, we’ve got that going for us.

pacers_380_bucks_100314A tale of two Brandon’s, as shown in their eyes.

Brandon Jennings – “OK, I’ve got ‘Sova in the corner, Andrew at the rim, or I can give you a shimmy and kill you with the pull up.  Pick your poison, Bunk.”

Brandon Rush – “Wait, this isn’t Tralfamadore!”

{ 1 comment }

Game #65 Recap – Surrender

by Tim Donahue on March 13, 2010 at 5:05 pm

For about 11 minutes last night, it looked like it might be a game.  The Pacers were playing relatively well, and the home crowd, fresh off of witnessing their boys in green brutalized by Memphis, were starting to get antsy.

Any concern they may have had proved unnecessary.

Last night’s game ended with 44 seconds left in the first quarter.  When a turnover led to a Nate Robinson three a mere four seconds after a Marquis Daniels jumper made it a 6-point Celtic lead, you could just see the Pacers crumple.  Sure, they played the next 37 minutes, mostly just to torture me, but the game was over.

This was the 26th double digit loss this season, the third most in Pacer NBA History.  They could very well catch #2 on the list (1986 with 28) by the end of this upcoming week.   About three weeks ago, I asked if this was the worst Pacer team ever.  Well, they certainly seem committed to achieving that distinction.  They’ve won 2 of the 12 games since that post:  one fun one against Chicago and one against a Philadelphia team with more dysfunction than the Pacers.

On top of that, one of the few areas that seemed to at least be heading in the right direction proved to be a false positive.  Jared and I have spent most of this season focusing on the Charlie-Foxtrot that is the Pacer offense.  Rightfully so, but the dazzling crapulence at that end caused me to get a little bit casual on the other end.  The overall statistical improvement and a few anecdotal losses where the defense would have been good enough to win if the offense had even just managed to be below average made me think it was improve.  Still not good, but improved.

However, what defense there may have been has clearly left the building.  In six games played during March, the Pacers’ Defensive Rating has ballooned to 114.8.  More importantly, I was looking at some trends over the course of the season, and I discovered something both rare and nauseating.  Amazingly, I could quantify attention span.

contempt

The chart you’re looking at here shows the progression of the points both scored and allowed per 100 possessions over the course of the game.  The red line is points allowed, or Defensive Rating, while the blue line is points scored , or Offensive Rating.  While not 100% conclusive, looking at this indicates to me that the Pacers are actually worse at everything than their overall numbers would tell you.  In other words, the Pacers fall behind early (trailing after 1st quarter in 42 of 65 games), and, as the other team lets up (loses interest), the numbers get better.

Another piece of circumstantial evidence that would support this conclusion would be looking at the fourth quarter results, particularly at the defensive end.  The Defensive Rating for each of the first three quarters are 112, 107, and 106, respectively.  In fourth quarters, it drops (”improves”) to less than 102.  Further parsing this information shows you that the Pacers have entered the fourth quarter trailing by double digits 25 times.  I don’t have the data for last night’s game, but in the first 24 instances, they posted a Defensive Rating of just under 95.  Over the course of the season, those meaningless fourth quarters shave a full point per 100 possessions off the Pacers defense.

So, it could be argued that the Pacers appear to be a statistically average defensive team, rather than a poor one, for the simple reason that their opponent often doesn’t have to worry for long periods of the game.

Mark & Slick on the Mike

Some comments from last night’s game:

Slick: “I really want Josh to succeed, but he’s really going to have to develop some kind of offensive game to play in the NBA.”

Got a couple of three’s late, but Josh is still pretty much dunk-or-bust.  He got completely stuffed by Glen Davis in the first half on a dunk attempt, but I thought it looked like he was going to miss the dunk anyway, as he was too far away from the rim and the block was basically at rim level.

Slick: “We’re down 20 points. I wanna see A.J. Price play the entire second half.”

Well, he played the entire fourth quarter, in addition to about four minutes in the second quarter.  T.J. Ford left last night’s game with a groin injury and is doubtful for tomorrow’s game at Milwaukee.  The Pacers are only 6 losses/wins by Toronto away from being eliminated from the playoffs…officially.  Maybe we’ll see more Price, but I’m not holding my breath.

Mark: “It’s as if they don’t even know what strengths the players they’re playing against have.”

This comment was made after Nate Robinson made his 42nd unguarded three last night.  OK.  Maybe it was just his fifth, but, really, what’s the difference?  The basic point was that the Pacers were playing some of their worst defense of the season last night, and Mark and Slick were both pretty disgusted.

Slick “Some nights Danny gets on it at the defensive end, other nights he just as no interest in it.”

It’s true, Danny.  You need to figure out who you’re going to be.  I said it last week – this year is a warning.  Take it to heart.

Mark on Dahntay “He just hasn’t been able to do (defend) what he was brought here to do.”

Slick on Dahntay “When the ball gets to him, the offense stops” then, “At the defensive end, let’s face it, he’s overrated.”

This isn’t the first time that Mark and Slick have basically come out and said that Dahntay is not a very good defender.  This was a subject of conversation in the Nuggets game.  When the Pacers signed Jones, I thought he would be a 15-20 minute a night bench player.  I didn’t think he was a great defensive player, maybe not even a good one, but he was going to be an upgrade on who we had.  He’s been better offensively than I though, but basically, he’s been way more important than he should be.  This is one of the reasons that the Pacers are so bad.

They also commented on Brandon Rush and his “consistency,” which merited one of those silences where you can actually hear Slick rolling his eyes and shaking his head.  Additionally, you could hear Mark Boyle’s eyebrows go up when Jim O’Brien substituted Troy Murphy instead of Solomon Jones when McRoberts fouled out with just 45 seconds left.  It certainly appears that Solo’s year is over.

And Now for Something Completely Different

There really is only one bright spot this season for the Pacers, and that’s Roy Hibbert.  His development has been very strong, and he’s well ahead of where I thought he’d be at this point.  He seems to have defeated his first bottleneck – fouling – and now will have to continue to develop his overall game.  Last night, he scored 23 points, including an impressive 14-point third quarter.  He’s smart, works hard, and seems to be a genuinely good guy.  I doubt that he’ll ever be a consistently dominating big man, but he certainly looks like a solid starting NBA center to me.

surrender

Seems self-explanatory to me.

{ 1 comment }