From the monthly archives:

July 2009

Daily Thunder

For an eight-year NBA vet who also spent four years as the starting point guard in the esteemed UCLA basketball program, Earl Watson has managed to remain largely off the radar of most NBA fans. Best known as a solid defender and a guy capable of initiating an offense, Watson has had career stops in Seattle, Memphis, Denver, back to Seattle and then on to Oklahoma City when the Sonics became the Thunder.

Royce Young, on the other hand, is a guy best know for running arguably the best Thunder blog on the innertubes, Daily Thunder. He has been a diehard follower of the team since its humble beginnings nearly one year ago and has certainly watched them play a lot more than you have. Fortunately for us, he agreed to spend some of his precious time answering a few questions about the new point guard the Pacers just acquired. And he did all for you. Because he cares.

Remember this moment if he ever asks you to give him a kidney.

As always, I supplied the Qs, he supplied the answers.

Q1. Watson had a subpar season statistically last year, even for him. I’m hearing that this can be attributed to his unhappiness with not playing as much due to the Thunder youth movement and the fact that he busted his thumb at the beginning of the year. What actually happened?

Royce: I think it was a combination of the two. He did have some thumb issues on his shooting hand for most of the season. When that finally healed up, he put up a couple of his best games. Another part was that he just didn’t play well. He wasn’t productive when he was on the court, he didn’t shoot well and he turned the ball over more than he ever had before. He was so unproductive that eventually Scott Brooks tried Chucky Atkins at the backup point behind Russell Westbrook. Chucky Atkins! His thumb injury was definitely a large part of it, but it just seemed like Earl got in a rut when he got put behind Westbrook and he was never able to break out of it. His bad attitude didn’t really start until he was put at the end of the bench behind Atkins, so I don’t know how much that had to do with it.

Q2. How did he look on the court when he was playing?

Royce: At times, really good. He was always a threat for a fancy pass or a nice lob. He was a quality defender and played hard for the most part. But he was also the worst elbow jumpshooter I’ve ever seen and sometimes it seemed like he was on the court by himself. He forgot about teammates and would just shoot at will.

Q3. His three-point shooting was atrocious last year (23.5%), particularly in the 15 games he played in during the second half (16.1%). What was that all about and do you think he can bounce back above 35% next season in Jim O’Brien’s spread offense? He was up over 38% when he was playing with Ray and Rashard in Seattle’s free-wheeling, shoot-em-up offense back before your town hijacked the Sonics. Can he get back to that level?

Royce
: He just took bad shots. Most the threes he took were forced and came low in the shot clock or with a hand in his face. He really has awful shooting form and it was just kind of a miracle if it went in. I’m sure for the most part, the low percentage was just bad shot selection. But some it also is just because he’s not a very good shooter.

Q4. Were you upset to see him leave?

Royce: Absolutely not. He really drove me crazy. He took a lot of bad shots and would force passes. It almost seemed like he played with a chip on his shoulder, but the wrong kind of chip. Like when he was on the floor he wanted to prove HE should be getting the bulk of the minutes. He forced the issue and wasn’t much of a team point guard. Plus, he just looks plain weird.

Q5. Indiana hasn’t made many major acquisitions this offseason. Is there any reason Pacer fans should get excited about picking up Earl Watson?

Royce: Umm, I wouldn’t. But we kind of tried to talk ourselves in Etan Thomas this week, so it’s not like I would blame anyone for doing it. Earl can be a nice player. He’s a perfect backup point guard that can give you 20 good minutes a night. But that’s if he can accept that role. If he pouts and presses the way he did in OKC, then you’ll be a little sad 15 games in. But if he settles into a role, he could make you pretty happy I think. He’s not going to blow you away and rejuvinate his career or anything, but he can be productive for sure.

{ 5 comments }

These lyrics from the Counting Crows song “St. Robinson in His Cadillac Dream” aptly sum up the current state of Pacers Nation.

Indiana entered the summer of 2009 as a team needing to change and improve, but they had very few options to do so. They had the 13th and 52nd picks in a notoriously weak draft. They had a budget of around $9 million to fill out the roster. They had to figure out what to do with restricted free agents Jarrett Jack and Josh McRoberts.

With all of the exciting draft prospects gone by the time the Pacers picked, and all of the attractive free agents out of their price range, the Pacers options appeared to be a choice between “Meh” and “Bored, Now.” Watching Larry Bird and David Morway handle the draft and free agency this summer brought 30-year-old flashbacks of my mom shopping at Zayre’s for my school clothes. They have eschewed the trendier locales and the pricier aisles, instead heading straight to the clearance section — a strategy that seems destined to draw snickers from the cooler, richer kids and an exasperated “Awwww, mom!” from Pacer fans.

It’s hard for Pacer fans to watch that snazzy power forward (Blake Griffin) leaving the store in another team’s shopping basket, just as it was hard last summer when we couldn’t take home that really cool point guard (Derrick Rose). It’s hard for Pacer fans to watch their former nemesis (Detroit) go shopping with daddy’s Gold Card. It’s hard to watch that car they have come to like (Jarrett Jack) be replaced by a cheaper one with more miles (Watson).

It’s hard to get excited about adding a collection of players who scream “serviceable” when “difference-maker” is the most ardent desire. But, again, Pacer fans can find solace in the words of founding father Benjamin Franklin: “He that can have patience, can have what he will.”

Learning to Live “In Between

In my 43 years of stumbling through life, I’ve come to the conclusion that “in between” is without question the crappiest place to be.  That is where the Pacers and their fans find themselves. They are in between the bad and the good. In between the despair and the hope. In between the fall and the rise.

The problem with “in between” is the uncertainty. It’s the feeling that you could go either way. Doubt grows, first making you antsy, then panicky.

Now, don’t mistake my intentions here. I am not saying “Be patient. Everything will be OK.”  I have no idea whether everything will be OK. I am simply saying that remaining patient will be crucial for everyone as the Pacers try to get from here to there.

In the meantime, Bird and Morway must avoid confusing activity with accomplishment. It could be reasonably argued that the small moves this summer are proof that the front office is doing exactly that, but I would disagree on two counts. First of all, the acquisitions made this summer (Tyler Hansbrough, Dahntay Jones, Earl Watson and Solomon Jones) all bring qualities that were lacking in last year’s squad, primarily in the areas of defense, toughness and athleticism. Given the tenuous position of both their finances and their reputation, the Pacers must continue to put a competitive product on the floor. While none of these players may be difference makers, they may help players like Granger, Rush and Hibbert to be more effective.

Secondly, none of the decisions made this summer will be difficult to “un-make.” Some may question the length of Dahntay Jones’ contract or the size of Earl Watson’s one-year salary. But, as in all assessments, proper perspective is necessary.  To shed some light, I offer the following three financial nuggets:

  1. Only the contracts of Hansbrough and Dahntay Jones extend beyond two years (with the final two years of Hansbrough’s being team options)
  2. Over the next four years, Dahntay Jones will be paid $5 million less than the Pacers will have paid Jamaal Tinsley to not play a single game in three seasons.
  3. The five contracts added this summer (Watson, Jones, Jones, Hansbrough and McRoberts) represent about $27 million in total salary commitments (and that’s including team options). Compare that to the some past decisions that couldn’t be “un-made,” and you’ll see that the price paid to acquire five new players is roughly equal to the Jonathan Bender extension, about $6 million less than the salary burden added in the Murphleavy trade, and about $13 million less than the Tinsley extension.

The moves made by Bird and Morway this summer were designed to address modest, short-term goals without jeopardizing any long-term plans or flexibility. As with all decisions, some will prove wise, and some will prove foolish. But even if they all fail, they won’t cost the franchise as dearly as any one of a half-dozen or more foolish decisions made in the years since the Pacers played in the NBA Finals.

There will be one or two minor deals made yet this summer, the most likely of which will center around the rumored sign-and-trade deal with Boston for Marquis Daniels. It is doubtful, however, that any more acquisitions will cause much more than a ripple in terms of Pacer or NBA news.

A Light at the End of the Tunnel

Patience is crucial for Pacer fans, if for no other reason than to preserve their sanity. It took years to create this quagmire, and it will take years to extricate the team from it. Pacer fans will need to save their energy for next year, when we see the real, foundational moves begin to be made. (Or, at least, I hope will be made.)

There has been a recurring charge over the past few years that Indiana’s leadership, particularly Larry Bird, has the goal of perpetual mediocrity. I’ve always considered this a straw man argument, primarily because I can’t imagine Bird, of all people, embracing mediocrity.

That being said, I think it is valid to be worried that mediocrity may be the final result of Larry Bird’s tenure. Over the past two years, Bird and Morway have demonstrated that they are quite adept at righting the ship, plugging the leaks and navigating the treacherous seas the Pacers blundered into years ago. The bigger question remains whether or not they actually will lead the Pacers back into contention. They have done a wonderful job of bringing in players that the fans can feel good about cheering for, most recently demonstrated by Earl Watson’s charming and engaging performance in his fan chat. This is laudable, but these players will need to be able to win games, too.

Bird and Morway have shown the ability to make sound, conservative decisions when those are appropriate. But do they have a vision? Can they make bold, aggressive moves when the opportunity presents itself? Can they create that opportunity, if it is not forthcoming?

Regrettably, the answers to these questions belong to tomorrow. And tomorrow is not coming today.

So until it does, I leave you with one last quote from The Count of Monte Cristo author Alexandre Dumas Pére: “All human wisdom is summed up in two words: wait and hope.”

patience

{ 3 comments }

Talking About Pacers: July 29, 2009

by Jared Wade on July 29, 2009 at 6:08 pm · 2 comments

In the Indianapolis Star, Mike Wells is saying that the Earl Watson deal is for one-year/$3 million.

Watson signed a one-year deal for almost $3 million with the Pacers on Tuesday.

Yesterday, however, Bruno said that it was a “multi-year deal.”

Though the Pacers are otherwise a relatively young team, their pursuit of Watson, who signed a multi-year deal, sends a message.

Pacers.com also announced a multi-year deal, even titling the link to the story as “Watson signs multi-year deal.” (See screen shot below.)

The Indiana Pacers announced Tuesday they have signed veteran point guard Earl Watson to a multi-year contract. Per club policy, terms of the contract were not released.

Yet, Marc Stein of ESPN was also tweeting that it was a one-year deal as recently as this afternoon.

More bookkeeping to pass along: Indy’s deal with Earl Watson, official as of yesterday, is a one-year arrangement worth $2.8 million.

Generally, you would think the Pacers would be the most accurate here. Who knows though? Maybe there is an extra year(s), but it (they) is (are) nonguaranteed? Hopefully, this will all be sorted out soon enough.

And spsteveneson at Indy Cornrows is hoping Stein and Wells have it correct.

I know one of the things that let me really embrace bringing Watson to this team was the opportunity to also get him off the books next summer with just a one-year deal. That would at least allow the contracts Travis Diener, Watson and possibly T.J. Ford (player option) to vanish into thin air during the big summer of 2010. But a multi-year deal obviously changes that. Maybe he’s a guy who comes back from a bad situation last year and makes us want to keep him, but I’m really hoping that Wells is correct and the Pacers just screwed up their story here.

Meanwhile, Larry Bird thinks that Iverson might be better than Earl, but that Earl is the best free agent point guard for Indy. (Me and Ramon Sessions would probably disagree.)

“I feel he’s the best (free agent point guard) out there,” Pacers president Larry Bird said. “(Allen) Iverson’s out there, but for what we need, he’s the best for us.”

In non-Watson-related news, Frank Dell’apa the Boston Globe is saying that Gabe Pruitt is unlikely to be the player the Pacers would get back for Marquis in a sign-and-trade deal that feels, to me, more unlikely to occur by the day.

Pruitt is unlikely to be used as part of a sign-and-trade deal involving Indiana guard Marquis Daniels, since the Pacers have three point guards. A three-team trade involving Pruitt also is unlikely, a league source said.

NESN also broaches the idea that this whole thing might never happen.

What the Pacers want is promising young basketball players. They want to build a winning team by doing the little things right — they want to find those 24-year-old youngsters with potential and build.

The Pacers have Danny Granger, who gave them 25.8 points and 5.1 rebounds a night last year, under contract through 2014. Yes, that’s right, 2014 — they have a star swingman under their control while in his prime at 26, and they can keep him locked in until he’s 31. Now they just need to find the right complementary pieces to fit around him.

Larry Legend is smart. He knows that the Celtics aren’t offering him those pieces — not for Marquis Daniels, and not for anyone else. The Celtics aren’t giving up young talent.

Which is why finding a third team to complete the Daniels sign-and-trade deal makes sense. The Pacers need young talent and have a good bench player; the Celtics want a good bench player and have expiring contracts. Connect the dots — what Larry and his old budd Danny Ainge need to do is find a GM willing to give up a good young player for the expiring deals of Brian Scalabrine and/or Tony Allen.

That GM might not exist. And if he doesn’t, this whole sign-and-trade idea surrounding Marquis Daniels might just be a pipe dream.

Frank Isola of the New York Daily News is reporting that Jamaal Tinsley wants to play in his hometown even at a discount rate, mainly because Donnie Walsh is the Knicks GM.

Jamaal Tinsley is prepared to sign with the Knicks … assuming Donnie Walsh is willing to make him an offer. A source close to the free agent point guard said that Tinsley will commit to the Knicks, even it means accepting less money than other teams may offer, because he wants to be reunited with Walsh and play in New York. The Brooklyn-born Tinsley, banished all of last season by the Indiana Pacers due to disciplinary reasons, is scheduled to meet with Walsh and coach Mike D’Antoni Wednesday in New York.

Anthony Schoettle of the Indianapolis Business Journal reports on the predictable news that the Colts are a lot more popular than the Pacers.

Local sports marketers said the data has been trending in the Colts’ favor for more than five years.”Because Indiana has deep, deep roots as a basketball state, the numbers might take you back. But they’re consistent with my own surveys and data,” said Mark Rosentraub, sports business author and former dean at IUPUI. “This is certainly a reversal from the Reggie Miller era.”

Josh Dhani of Pacers Pulse talks about Jermaine O’Neal’s days as a Pacer.

On September 1, 2000, the Indiana Pacers made a trade that changed their whole team’s franchise for the next eight years to come. They traded big man Antonio [sic] Davis to the Portland Trailblazers for young, four-year pro Jermaine O’Neal. This was one of the smartest moves in Indiana Pacers history. He wasn’t that all impressive with Portland, as his career-high year with that team was in his second year, 1997, averaging about five points and three rebounds per game. The Pacers were going to have a great power forward/center for years to come.

watson_multiyear

The Pacers are saying Watson signed a “multi-year deal.” Wells and Stein are saying Watson signed a one-year deal. It would be nice to get this figured out.

{ 2 comments }

UPDATE: Earl Watson Live Chat

by Jared Wade on July 29, 2009 at 11:07 am · 1 comment

Sorry for the short lead time, but the Pacers newest acquisition will be chatting live with fans today at 4:30. Click here to join in or follow along.

Earl Watson, a point guard with eight years of NBA experience in Seattle, Memphis, Denver and Oklahoma City, was officially introduced today by Larry Bird.

Said Larry Legend:

“We’re very glad to have Earl as part of our team,” said Pacers President of Basketball Larry Bird. “I’ve been watching him for years. He’s a solid point guard that we know can help us on the defensive end.”

Much like most of the other Pacer moves this summer, Watson isn’t anything to be overly excited about, but aside from some reported differences of opinion on playing time last season, he has always had a sterling reputation as a great teammate. Plus he plays defense and is definitely a serviceable floor general who Jim O’Brien should be able to trust even in a starting role during those inevitable stretches when TJ Ford is hampered by injury.

UPDATE: I didn’t follow this live, but Pacers.com has the transcript still up.

Here are some of the highlights from Earl’s Q&A session:

4:30 [Comment From Luke]
What would you say the strengths of your game are?
4:30
I think playing in transition offensively and defensively setting the tone, being aggressive and physical on the ball, and also making my teammates better.
4:31 [Comment From Kyle]
Earl, I’m glad the Pacers added you to our roster. Your veteran presence along with T.J., Danny, Mike, Troy, Dahntay, and Jeff should help tremendously to our young and improving roster. I look forward to seeing you on the court. Any clue as to your jersey number?
4:32
No. 2. I’ve known Brandon Rush since he was about 5 years old. He wears my number 25. I don’t know if he copied me and wanted to be like me or because I love him like a brother — honestly, we’re like family. I just decided to let him represent it to the fullest and I’m just going to take the two part of it. LOL.
4:34 [Comment From Evan]
Did any Pacer players contact you prior to your signing that encouraged you to join the Pacers as opposed to some other team? If so, who?
4:36
I actually play pickup with Danny Granger all the time at UCLA so I see him a couple fimtes a week. It was pretty much a done deal so he didn’t have to recruit me. And I talked to Brandon on the phone. He was excitted till I asked for my jersey number, then he hung up and I haven’t heard from him since. LOL.
4:38 [Comment From matt]
Any lingering problems from last year’s fractured thumb?
4:39
No, it’s finally healthy. My doctor said it would take a year and he was pretty accurate. I’ve been working really hard to get back to the year where I had my career numbers. If you look at my stats over last season, the longer the season went the better my percentages got. I came back too early but that’s the type of player I am. I’m addicted to the game that I love.

Aside from the fact that he used the term “LOL” twice, it actually looked like it was a pretty good chat. Nice to see that Earl has a little character to him. I think his public persona has always tended towards the more robotic side.

To me, that’s often the best part about a veteran acquisition; you get to closely familiarize yourself with a guy who you have previously only watched from afar.

As to the thumb injury, this, along with OKC’s focus on playing its young players last season, can hopefully give Pacer fans some confidence that the 30-year-old Watson’s subpar stats last season were only a anomalous blip on the radar and not a sign that his NBA career has already begun its downslope.

Conrad spoke to this point in his write up yesterday.

He’s 30, entering his ninth NBA season. He’s not far removed from career-high averages of 10.7 points and 6.8 assists with Seattle in 2007-08, his last fully healthy season.

He dealt with the residual effects of coming back ahead of schedule from a fractured thumb last season and wound up shooting a career-low .235 from the 3-point line. The previous three seasons, he shot a combined .367 from the arc.

Given what the O’Brien system usually does for 3-point percentage, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Watson eclipse 40% this season from behind the arc — or even be completely shocked to see him reach 42%, really. Dunleavy, Troy and Diener all shot well above their career highs from three under O’Brien.

Why not Watson, too?

{ 1 comment }