From the monthly archives:

February 2010

The later and later it has gotten, the more and more I have been expecting the team to officially shut down Tyler Hansbrough for the rest of the year. Well, that still hasn’t happened, but Mike Wells is today reporting that Tyler’s coach doesn’t expect him back.

“I don’t think there’s been an official announcement, but it would not surprise me not to have him the rest of the year,” O’Brien said. “I’m not counting on him to be back.

“He’s dealing with a tough situation. It’s getting deep into the season. He’s unable to practice and condition. He would have to get himself in condition again if he got better within the next three weeks. That’s a tough situation.”

Tyler appeared in four games in mid-January after sitting out for two weeks with an inner ear infection but was by his own admission “dizzy” the entire time and never played more than 13 minutes. The final game in that stretch was on January 16 and he played just 4 minutes.

He hasn’t suited up since.

Tomorrow will be March and he for all intents and purposes hasn’t played since just after Christmas. And given the uncertainty surrounding an affliction that has turned from an inner ear infection to vertigo-like symptoms that prevent him from even flying in an airplane to “Jeez, he hasn’t played basketball in two months” … this is now beyond simply unfortunate and “a wasted rookie season” — it is officially troubling.

And I’m not in the locker room and haven’t ever spoken to Tyler, but from everything I’ve read from Wells and elsewhere, it sounds like the uncertainty isn’t just among the fan base. It doesn’t sound like anyone — Tyler, O’Brien, Larry Bird, doctors — really knows what is going on here.

As O’Brien says, Tyler’s rookie year is probably over. There’s very little point in an out-of-shape Hansbrough trying to race back for the final 10 games of a pointless Pacers season. The last thing you would want is for him to catch a Kurt Rambis-type clothesline going up for a lay up or smack his head on the floor diving for a loose ball — as he’s been known to do. Let’s just keep the docs on the case, figure out what’s going on and hope he can — literally — get his head right over the Summer.

Hopefully, that’s all it takes.

But in “officially troubling” news … Tim earlier brought up the Wikipedia entry for former Cincinnati Red and Boston Red Sox Nick Esasky.

Though he twice hit more than 20 home runs in a season with the Reds, his best statistical year came in 1989 as a member of the Boston Red Sox to whom he was traded for switch-hitting first baseman/outfielder Todd Benzinger. During that season, he hit .277 with 30 home runs and 108 runs batted in. That offseason, as a free agent, Esasky signed a three-year, $5.6 million contract with the Atlanta Braves, but was forced to retire after playing just nine games due to developing vertigo stemming from an ear infection. His salary was paid for by insurance.

Yup.

This is officially troubling.

vertigo hitchcock

{ 5 comments }

Game #59 Recap – That Was Fun

by Tim Donahue on February 28, 2010 at 11:20 am · 7 comments

We at 8p9s have made it a point to try to make “new age” NBA Advanced Statistics a part of the normal conversation.  Some might say that we – or, more accurately, I – might tend to get a little bit in the weeds.  That may be so, but we will continue to believe we’re on the side of the angels, there.  However, we’re not going to do numbers today.  Without wavering in our commitment to Advanced Stats, I’m just going to talk about the experience of the game last night

  • The Crowd – Though it’s true that there were plenty of Bulls fans there, it was still heartening to see the Fieldhouse pretty much full.  It was also nice to see a connection between the crowd and the players.   Bulls fans, though full-throated early, were pretty easily shouted down by the Pacer partisans.  The atmosphere was as energetic as I’ve felt this year.
  • The Movement – Backcuts, passing, alley-oops.  Last night was one of the few times that this team didn’t look like they’d met each other for the first time upon arriving at the arena.  Yes, there were plenty of turnovers, but few of them were of the mindless sort we’re so used to (and sick of) seeing.
  • The Players – Pretty much everybody that played contributed last night.  (Dunleavy only made one four-minute appearance, then did not return, but I’ll not borrow that trouble right now.)  Watson was aggressive early and often.  Hibbert was a presence in the paint and in the high post.  Dahntay, T.J., and Luther all were active and played with a purpose.  Murphy hit shots, Brandon stayed active.
  • The Team – The Pacers have been hard to get a handle on this year.  I don’t have access to the locker room, or anyone’s innermost thoughts (perhaps not even my own), so I have no clue as to the mental state of this unit.  However, last night, they were a team.  Roy and Troy were cheering for each other.  They were talking and supportive and excited.  I think they probably tend to get too high after success and too low after failures, but last night was just right.   It’s good to see these guys still be able to pull for each other this late in a brutal season.
  • The Man – Danny has quietly begun to find his game.  Post All Star break, he’s averaging 26.5 points and 6.8 rebounds a night.  More importantly, his eFG% is .561, a full 8 points above his pre-break average (I had to give a little taste, but just a little one.)  I missed the Houston game, so I don’t know if he’s put a full game together yet or not, but this is the Danny this team needs.
  • The Company – I got to watch the game with my brother last night, which is always an under-appreciated pleasure.  It’s both refreshing and comforting to fall into the old patterns while watching a game.  Plus, it’s great to draw on his decades and decades (and decades and decades) of experience playing and watching basketball.  At halftime, I had a great chat with BillS and DukeDynamite of Pacers Digest fame.  BillS thought that he saw some impact from the premiere of Winning Time. Several of the players were in attendance at Friday night’s showing, and Bill thought he saw the Pacers being more physical when the Bulls penetrated the paint.  God knows it couldn’t hurt.
  • The Future – Ehhh…this will come uninvited soon enough.  The Pacers face four winning teams this week on a tough Western swing.  The core issues are still there, and there is a whole lotta work to be done before last night’s performance will be the norm.  This is like a warm day in the dead of winter.  You take it for what it is, and squeeze as much as you can out of it.  You know it won’t last.

54

Feel the sunshine while you can.  It is all too rare an occurrence these days.

{ 7 comments }

Anticipating the Hurt

by Tom Kester on February 26, 2010 at 12:15 pm · 9 comments

I realized something after watching the Pacers lose to … I don’t know … who was it?

The last one.

Wait a sec.

The Bucks. Yeah, that one. They’re all starting to merge in my memory.

At the same time I was watching the Bucks beat us again, I was occasionally clicking over to watch Indiana University host Wisconsin. The last time I clicked, the score was 43-22 Badgers at around the 17 minute mark of the 2nd half.

And about that time I realized my life is pretty good. Really. Not kidding.

I have a job. The wife loves me. My kids are in college or already graduated. Roof doesn’t leak. Car starts. (I have a roof!) I like the folks I work with … everything’s pretty good.

Yep.

Pretty good. Almost perfect.

In fact, all I’d have to do to be as close to perfect happiness as my neuroses allow…is to quit being a fan of Indiana basketball. That’s all. One simple tweak.

And why not? There’s no percentage in sticking to my guns here.

I can barely stand to watch anymore. I won’t even try to recite a litany of all the classic fail strategies the Pacers have employed this season. And last season. And … yeah. The one before that. You know all the scenarios already. All the three to four game themes of futility. The inevitable roster rearrangement to address the perceived problem, which proceeds to morph into a totally different calamity.

Hey. We have a line-up for that. You know … unless the guys are broke. Eh, we’ll put somebody out there. We’re rebuilding.

It’s even affected my enjoyment of the game in general. I never tune to the west coast games anymore after the Pacers lose. I might see a team playing good ball. And I don’t think I could take that.

I used to enjoy listening to Denari and Buckner on the Pacers broadcasts. Now Quinn just pisses me off, and Denari seems like nothing but a shill. The Pacers web site? Used to enjoy it. Now, that headline writer is starting to irk me. “Pacers’ comeback falls short.” Dude, you’re wearing out the font on that one. (What happened to them? They seemed perfectly adequate when we were competitive. Sorry, guys. Maybe it’s me.) I go to my nice full fridge at half-time, and the snacks have no appeal. I open a carefully selected microbrew, and it sits on the table for ten minutes before I even think to take a drink. What enjoyment could there be in it? I go to work with my amiable coworkers, to do a job I’m good at, and which I enjoy … and they pay me … and if it’s a day after a Pacers game, I’m in a bad mood. It’s getting to the point where the bad mood begins the afternoon before the game. Anticipating the hurt.

And it’s pathetic, because here I am whining about my depression…when my life is great. Those kids in China … (what?) …  You know … those kids in China. That were starving? So you should eat your peas? (Wrong generation?) Those kids. Anyway, you know they’d be overjoyed to have my problems. Now that they’re grown up, and suffering through whatever tragedy we can imagine someone having who lives in a far-off land where life is hard … they’d love to have my problems, right?

Because I don’t really have any. Life is good. Life is darned good. I am fortunate. Except for the state of Indiana basketball.

I guess it’s all about perspective. Think of the lessons of the suffering of Job, rather than the mysteries of the machinations of J’OB. Or maybe it’s cosmic law. No one gets to be 100 percent happy. Read sub-paragraph B of Clause 112 to the 14th Law of Thermodynamics. “If things are otherwise good, your ball team must suck.”

The flip side would be the classic sports stereotype. When times are hard, your team wins the big game and makes everything seem OK for a while.

That sounds about right. It all balances out. Those now grown-up suffering kids in China? They probably follow Chinese pro teams that could beat the Pacers.

{ 9 comments }

When an NBA team is as bad as this year’s Pacers are, everything comes into question. The players. The coach. The GM. So it’s no surprise that a lot of fans, both of the Pacers and just the NBA in general, have been wondering if Larry Bird might be — or even should be — on his way out.

According to Larry’s boss, Pacers Sports and Entertainment President Jim Morris, Mr. Legend isn’t going anywhere anytime soon. Reports the Indianapolis Business Journal (via Pacers Digest):

Pacers Sports and Entertainment President Jim Morris gave Bird, Pacers president of basketball operations, a hearty vote of confidence yesterday.

Bird’s contract expires in 2011, and some have speculated that team owner Herb Simon is becoming impatient with Bird. Morris said that’s not the case.

“Larry Bird has everyone’s confidence here,” Morris told IBJ. “He’s working as hard as humanly possible. And we know he will do what it takes to get us a championship caliber team.”

Morris said he and Simon realize the strategy to re-build the Pacers is a multi-year plan. Much of that appears to revolve around clearing player salary cap space to bring in key free agents following the 2010-11 season.

I wouldn’t go so far as to say I have total confidence in Larry’s ability to turn this thing around, but I certainly don’t think he should be fired before given a legitimate opportunity to succeed. Regardless of how the team is doing right now, and regardless of what errors in judgment may have been made, the owners can’t tell a guy “we’re with you on a three-year turnaround plan” and then go and fire the guy 18 months later.

The time line for righting the ship was set for Summer 2011. Everyone was on board with this. From a salary cap perspective, it was the only real option after the decisions were made to get rid of the troublemakers even if that meant bringing in bad contracts. I’m sure Larry was among those committing to that reality and realizing that it might mean an extended rebuild, but it was an organizational decision, not just a choice made by one man.

The plan was to be back in better shape to contend in the Summer of 2011. Until then, and despite any fun we might like to have at the guy’s expense, Larry deserves to be the captain of this rickety ship.

{ 1 comment }