Posts by author:

Ronald Eugene

The rolling Indiana Pacers are now picking up bandwagon followers, including including the perennially-pessimistic Indy Star columnist Bob Kravitz (though he does take the time to pepper in a few Colts references). With last week’s lone loss coming under an abbreviated squad against the number one team in the NBA, the Pacers appear to be more of a playoff contender than a beneficiary of a cake-walk early schedule (sixth easiest through 12 games).

The next two weeks will be very revealing as to the team’s potential. The season’s only western road trip features some winnable games before the final stop in Los Angeles than a homecoming to face the surprisingly strong Orlando Magic, a team enjoying the calm before the ensuing trade deadline storm. Six of the next seven are on the road, however, where the Pacers have been a model of inconsistency.

Roy Hibbert’s Contract Year

The big man is earning himself a lot of money. With his rookie contract expiring at the end of this season, Hibbert could garner a lot of interest from around the league. It seems likely that he would want to extend his stay in Indiana, and Larry Bird will probably be willing to do what it takes for that to happen.

Hibbert is now a double-double machine and defensive menace anchoring the league’s fourth-best defense. Though his scoring hasn’t been phenomenal, his shooting percentage and points per game have improved from last season. In a match-up against a team without an effective post-defense, Hibbert could be a first or second-round nightmare in the playoffs.

Area 55 could look a lot bigger next year.

Hicks vs. Geriatrics

In my last column, I discussed the growing (and mainly fabricated on my part) beef between the Boston Celtics and Pacers after Ray Allen said that West’s “ego kicked in” and he “wanted the dollars” when deciding to sign with Indiana. That was followed up by somewhat insulting piece lauding the Boston tradition and lambasting a man that didn’t want to be a part of it.

In other news, the Pacers have man-handled the Celtics twice in eight days. With that, I would like to end each column by tracking each team through the season. You know, just to help my ego kick in. What else is there to do in these cornfields?

As of January 16:

Pacers 9-3 (4th in East)
Boston 4-8 (9th in East)

If the 2012 playoffs* started today, the first round match-up would be …

#4 Pacers vs. #5 Hawks

*Boston not present

{ 1 comment }

Indiana After Eight Games

by Ronald Eugene on January 9, 2012 at 5:23 pm · 2 comments

With the young NBA season already heating up, it appears the Pacers could be a tough opponent. So long as they don’t actually play the Miami Heat, that is. Though the season is just eight games young, the Pacers appear to be a solid playoff team: they’ll take care of business against bad teams and hold serve at home.

Of course, these are my thoughts following back-to-back wins at Boston and against the not-yet-tragic Charlotte Bobcats. Whereas last Thurdsay, I was trying to calculate how many wins it would take to notch the eight seed again this season in the East. Such is life in this shortened, compacted NBA season in which the Pacers may be a much more even keel squad than most teams based on their depth and non-reliance on one individual player.

Price Check

My displeasure with Lance Stephenson as a member of the rotation has been documented on this site. My affinity for AJ Price should also be known. Still, early performances should make this preference an easy decision. Though the numbers don’t overwhelmingly tilt in Price’s direction, simple observation does.

With Price, the offense seems comfortable and directed. He’s no Mark Jackson, and never will be. He is, however, a consummate teammate (watch him on the bench during games) and a calming force in the high-energy second unit, which has been the team’s strength in recent wins.

Price was productive in last spring’s playoff series against the Bulls, both in his back-up role and when filling in for an injured Darren Collison in game two with the starters. He’s a highly competent backup, a perfect set-up man at the beginning of the second quarter and end of the third.

Stephenson’s potential, on the other hand, is undeniable. He’s unbelievably quick and often flashy. He could, possibly, someday, maybe, be a solid NBA starter that teams have to gameplan for.

But here’s the thing: He’s not right now.

The offense stalls with him in the game. George Hill has to take on much more of the ball-handling to keep things going. Oddly, however, Frank Vogel has already said that Stephenson will return to his role as Darren Collison’s backup. I wonder how much management is pulling strings to keep Stephenson in the game?

Frank’s quotes aren’t exactly a ringing endorsement of Stephenson. He brings up the same points I just did.

“[I’m] looking forward to him taking advantage of his skills when he starts to come around.”

On the other hand, he likes what he has seen out of Price.

“The offense flows when he’s in the game. The ball moves, he’s a great passer, a great leader of the team.”

For a team needing all the wins it can get now for a potential third seed in the playoffs, this seems pretty cut and dry to me. Take certainty now over future promise.

Go West, Young Man

Recently, David West has taken quite a bit of flak for his decision to sign with the Pacers rather than the Boston Celtics. Reports are that the two deals were pretty similar. This led to a quote from Celtics guard Ray Allen who essentially called West (and I’m summarizing) a money-grubbing egotistical jerk that doesn’t care about winning or a championship.

Admittedly, my avulsion for Boston’s reaction to this may be tainted by years of disdain for that city ever since Willie McGinest faked an injury on a goal-line stand against the Colts in 2004.

Another article written by a Boston-based reporter was published the day of the Pacers/Celtics game. The author essentially paints West as a man not driven by ego, but afraid of the spotlight in Boston and tradition of the Celtics. It goes so far as to print a quote from West about him not being a nightlife, party guy. The implication is that West wants to lead a ho-hum life in the “cornfields” of Indiana on an average team rather than be subjected to the scrutiny of the league’s most storied franchise.

I would like to add three sidenotes to the Pacers-Celtics debate. First of all, David West is a family man with a wife and two children. No wonder he’s not out clubbing. Second, the Celtics are not a championship contender. The team shipped out Kendrick Perkins last year and shopped around its franchise point guard this season, essentially destroying their team chemistry. The average age of Boston’s “Big Three” is 35. And lastly, the Pacers might actually be the better team. After all, they won the game, in pretty dominating fashion in Boston even with a sub-par game from West.

{ 2 comments }

Saddled with high expectations after a subtly superb offseason and following a dominating win in the season opener, the Pacers defeated a not-as-awful-as-we-thought Toronto Raptor squad in what was the home opener for Canada’s only team.

The beginning of the game looked exactly as we expected in the beginning of the season after an extended lockout and abbreviated training camp. The team were throwing the ball everywhere, except in the basket. At the end of the first quarter, Toronto had just eleven points. Granted, part of that could be the pesky prowess of the Pacers’ rangy defenders. But still. Eleven!

To be fair, the rustiest part of the post-lockout NBA may be the officiating, but more on that later. The officiating has been awful thus far. Great examples in this game included obvious basket interference, an airball free throw that didn’t stop play and a foul called on Lou Amundson when a Raptors player leaned right into him.

Regardless, for the second straight game in as many attempts, the Pacers shot under 40% but came out on top. Tha seems to be a sign of better things to come (and the team is already on pace to go 66-0).

Speaking of things to come, Paul George appears to be dramatically improved from his rookie season. It’s prudent to avoid any outlandish predictions, especially since the opponents combined for just 52 wins last season (a sum less than that compiled by seven individual teams). Thus far, however, he appears confident and improved, a legitimate force that teams will need to game plan for defensively.

George still has a lot of growing up to do as a starter in the NBA. As a glaring example, he shot — and missed — a three-pointer with the shot clock turned off at the end of the third quarter when the Pacers could have held for the last shot with a 10-point lead. That absent-mindedness led to a Toronto basket on the other end. Still, he could really be something — and that could happen relatively soon.

Last year, George became a lockdown defender whose offensive presence was mainly a liability except in transition. Now, his perimeter shooting has become a legitimate threat (he hit 4 treys tonight), which will only help spread the floor and open up the interior for Roy Hibbert, David West and Tyler Hansbrough.

Though George may have been the flashiest, Darren Collison was quietly magnificent. As the team still adjusts to a revamped system with new pieces, Collison has kept the offense serviceable despite poor shooting. George Hill will certainly play better and become more comfortable, but for now, the battle for the starting point guard spot isn’t even close. Case and point: The Pacers were +16 with Collison in the game, -8 with Hill.

Early excitement for this season centers around the Pacers extreme depth, in which any of seven players (supposedly) could lead the team in scoring on any given night. But in the second game of this shortened season, it became patently obvious that Danny Granger still runs the show.

With the once-comfortable lead dwindling down to five, Granger nailed a deep three to push the lead back to arm’s reach with just over two minutes left in the contest. A minute later, now up just two, he hit another triple to help ice the game. before West did so for good with a jumper of his own.

Danny Granger: Still the leader; still the man; at least for now.

Other Thoughts

  • In a game played north of the border, nothing is more entertaining than yelling “He shot that from (insert obscure Canadian location here)!” Based on Paul George’s showing from long range, I got to use Ottawa, Prince Edward Island, Calgary, Vancouver and Prince Albert (yes, it’s a real city there).
  • A.J. Price is the Dominic Rhodes of the Pacers. He spends all game on the bench getting hype out of his mind and bounces around to congratulate his teammates during timeouts. At some point this season, Collison will get in foul trouble, and Lance Stephenson will be serving a suspension for setting off firecrackers in Vogel’s office (or whatever teenage delinquents do these days). Then, we’ll actually get to see Price play. Sources say he wasn’t half-bad in the Pacers playoff series last season.
  • Officiating has been awful thus far. Great examples in this game included obvious basket interference, an airball free throw that didn’t stop play and a foul called on Lou Amundson when a Raptors player leaned right into him.
  • Some people like Amundson’s potential, but if you ask me, Jeff Foster cannot get healthy fast enough.

{ 11 comments }

Looking at the crowd, you wouldn’t know they played in Indiana. (Photo: Jonathan Daniel/Getty)

Game 4 had to have felt exactly like reliving Game 1 to the Indiana Pacers. Improbably leading the entire game, some of it by double-digits, the Indiana lead began to diminish rapidly over the final three minutes of the game: a 10-point cushion turned into a one-possession game in a hurry. All the while, the red sea of fans was going bananas, attempting to spur its team to a thrilling comeback win.

The problem is that Game 4 took place at Conseco Fieldhouse. In a series in which the Pacers dropped the first two contests despite leading for almost 60 minutes, the blue and gold returned to Indy for what they thought would be home-court advantage. It turned out to be a home invasion.

Thursday’s crowd was split 50-50 with the Pacer faithful out-performing their red counterparts. Returning from perhaps the most encouraging losses in franchise history, fans showed up rowdy and ready for Game 3. Post-game quotes from Frank Vogel and Danny Granger as well as the opinion of one ESPN Chicago columnist who said the Bulls playing Indiana “had to feel like swimming with their clothes on” ran across the bigscreen.

Make no mistakes about the fact that Chicago fans were definitely in attendance at Thursday’s Game Three in extraordinarily high numbers. At times, the atmosphere resembled that of a high school game: each side alternated cheers and jeers for its preferred group. But it was a neutral environment at worst where the Pacer players at least got to enjoy the confines of a familiar locker room and well-known path to work.

Game 4, however, was nothing short of embarrassing for anyone who cares about Indiana basketball. What was reported as maybe a 50-50 crowd by TNT (or so I heard, since I actually bought tickets to the game and therefore did not watch it on TV) was more like 70-30. And a meek 30% at that.

Pacers officials would have been better off not allowing the pre-game introductions to take place. Chicago fans nearly took the roof off as the announcer said the names of their starters, then rained down boos on the Pacers’ five. The crowd was silent for most of the game, during which the Pacers held a double-figure lead, then nearly spurred the road team to a massive comeback.

Such an overwhelming migration of fans from Chicago has created quite a bit of media attention. The search for explanations has yielded a few reasonable answers. Comparable tickets were often ten times more expensive in the United Center as in Conseco Fieldhouse. The Bulls had a better season. Many IU and Purdue students are from the Chicago area. And so on. And so forth.

One Pacers worker, tossing out t-shirts at the end of the first quarter, shared how disgusted he was at the turnout to me, mainly because the lovely lady who escorted me to the game and I were the only Pacers fans in the section. “I don’t see how anyone can say this isn’t a fair-weather city,” he said.

Indy Star columnist extraordinaire Bob Kravitz essentially excused the turnout, writing that the Pacers can’t “field a lousy and thoroughly irrelevant team for four-plus years, then have a decent two months and expect the entire city to reach for its wallets.”

Who’s right? Well, both to an extent.

Kravitz is correct in that the Pacers, after a season that saw a coaching change and ended eight games under .500, can’t expect the kind of fan support that a team with the league’s best record (and six previous championships) enjoys. But at the same time, tickets were available the week of the games for $13 apiece. It isn’t exactly a second mortgage.

The truth is that Indianapolis, unlike Chicago or New York, is a fair-weather sports city. Kravitz using the Indianapolis Colts 1999 playoff game against the Tennessee Titans is a perfect illustration. That year, the Colts finished 13-3, but Tennessee fans filled the RCA Dome in large numbers (although not as bad of a ratio as this series’ Game 4).

Some may say that Indianapolis did not have a deep connection yet to the Colts with the team only having been in town since 1984 and having yet to experience any real success at that point. And what a fine justification that is if we ignore the fact that Tennessee had only had a football franchise for three years in 1999 with the previous two being 8-8 seasons.

The truth is that Indianapolis is a fair-weather sports city. And it was humiliatingly on display to a national audience in Game 4.

{ 18 comments }