Posts tagged as:

Cap & Trade

The best news for Pacers fans this weekend was not even Pacers-related. It was about money. Specifically, it looks like the NBA’s wallet is not being quite as hard hit as expected so far this season.

This season’s NBA ticket revenues have not dropped as much as the league office projected over the summer. The league expected a 6% to 7% drop in ticket sales but there has been only a 1.7% drop to date.

Attendance is flat or ahead of last season’s pace in the majority of NBA arenas. The Nets and Pistons account for most of the small overall decline.

“The fact that we’re only down roughly 1.7% going into tonight’s games, I’m pleased about,” said NBA executive Chris Granger.

This doesn’t mean that the NBA is out of the woods yet, but if tickets keep selling ahead of the league’s preseason projected pace then next year’s salary cap, which was expected to drop significantly, will likely not fall to such a degree that the Pacers will forced to make salary dumping moves that they wouldn’t otherwise make.

shrinking NBA salary cap

The background here is that, given the ongoing economic downturn, the NBA expected its revenue to plummet across the league this year. Not only was attendance expected to dwindle, but this in addition to other sluggish returns had league execs projecting a significant drop in the all-important “basketball-related income” figure, which is what defines what the following year’s salary cap (and, thus, the luxury tax threshold) will be.

The 2009-10 salary cap had already gone backwards (from $58.7 million per team in 2008-09 to $57.7 per team this year), but that drop was not nearly as large as what the NBA was projecting for 2010-11. (See chart on right, courtesy of ESPN, for recent cap history.)

As ESPN’s Marc Stein put it:

The official league memorandum, obtained by ESPN.com, forecasts a dip in basketball-related income in the 2009-10 season of 2.5 percent to 5 percent, which threatens to take the 2010-11 cap down some $5 million to $8 million from last season’s $58.7 million salary cap.

A significant drop for the luxury-tax threshold is also projected going into the summer of 2010. If basketball-related income drops by 2.5 percent in 2009-10, league officials are projecting a 2010-11 salary cap of $53.6 million and a luxury-tax line of $65 million.

If BRI, as it is referred to in the NBA, decreases by 5 percent, teams would be looking at a $50.4 million salary cap and a luxury-tax line of $61.2 million in 2010-11.

“Teams should be aware of this projected BRI decrease,” reads the memo, “and plan accordingly.”

That “plan accordingly” aspect is what many small-market fans have been fearing. If the 2010-11 luxury tax was set at $61.2 million, the Pacers would already be over that line by around $4 million. Being over by that much would require owner Herb Simon to not only hand over $8 million to the league but would hit him with the proverbial “double-whammy,” as he would also be forfeiting the end-of-the-year payout that all the teams below the luxury tax receive — a check that equaled nearly $3 million last year.

So if next year’s luxury tax was set as low as the worst-case league projection of $61.2 million, Herb and Larry Bird would either (a) have to find a way to shave more than $4 million off of next year’s payroll (something easier said than done), or (b) bite the bullet and lose roughly $11 million (the $8 million in tax Herb would have to pay in tax plus an estimated $3 million he would not get back from the league.) For a guy who has been hemorrhaging untold tens of millions over the past decade on this team, asking him to lose another #11 million — on top of the $65 million for next year’s projected salary and whatever other enormous costs it takes to run an NBA team — would be asking quite a bit.

Fortunately, however, that mini-doomsday scenario looks a little less likely in lieu of recent news.

And that’s a good thing

A very, very good thing.

In related news, the Pacers are one of the teams whose attendance has dropped — so things aren’t all peaches and cream in Conseco. Last year, Indy averaged a lowly 14,182 fans per home game, which was worse than every other franchise except for Memphis (12,745) and Sacramento (12,571) . This year, reported attendance is down to 13,578 (which is, again, “worsted” by only Memphis and Sacto). The difference of 600 people per night isn’t going to make or break the team’s bank account, but any drop is obviously a negative and if the team gets worse — a definite possibility — than so might the attendance numbers.

So while today’s leaguewide ticket sale numbers are good — and the more important — news, let’s also be sure to keep an eye on the team’s ticket sales.

pacers conseco attendance

She’s still here at least. (Photo: Sam Riche)

{ 0 comments }

Cap & Trade: 2010-11 Cap May Dip to $50M

by Tim Donahue on November 6, 2009 at 11:48 am · 1 comment

Buried at the bottom of Ric Bucher’s “3 Seconds” feature on page 84 of the November 16th issue of ESPN the Magazine, was this little blurb:

It’s early, but league officials estimate the NBA salary cap will dip from $53 million to $50 million.

Yet another piece of bad news to the beleaguered franchises around the league, most notably, your Indiana Pacers. John Hollinger first noted this back in January, and Marc Stein echoed those sentiments in July.

The passage most germane to the Pacers is this:

If BRI [basketball related income], as it is referred to in the NBA, decreases by 5 percent, teams would be looking at a $50.4 million salary cap and a luxury-tax line of $61.2 million in 2010-11.

As I had noted in my column about dumping Droopy McTinsleberry, the Pacers were already perilously close to the luxury tax threshold when it was projected at $65 million. Now, despite all of their wrangling the last two years, they are back in cap hell.

According to Shamsports.com, the Pacers already have $60.2 million tied up in contracts for only 12 players next year. Two of those contracts are partially unguaranteed (McRoberts & Price), but they’re minimum level contracts and would have to be replaced by other mininimum level contracts. Adding to the Pacers’ misery is the fact that they have to pay Jamaal Tinsley another $5.5 million on top of that number.

So, all told, they’re basically committed to roughly $65.7 million in payroll next year at this point. Add in another roughly $2.5 to $3.0 million for their draft picks next year, and the Pacers are sitting between $7 and $8 million over the tax threshold. Once you factor in the distribution that they won’t receive for being under the tax (an average of about $3.0 million), this news could cost the floundering Pacers $10 to $11 million next season.

Ouch.

In order to avoid this, the Pacers would have to find someone willing to take one of their large contracts in exchange for an expiring. Jeff Foster was a likely candidate, but his $6.7 million may not be big enough. Unless you want to throw Danny on the table, that leaves the Pacers going around, hat in hand, trying to find a taker for T.J. Ford ($8.5 million), Mike Dunleavy ($10.6 million) or Troy Murphy ($12.0 million).  Unfortunately, they’ll be jostling with several other teams trying to do the same thing — possibly with even better players being offered for peanuts — and knocking on the doors of teams who won’t be anxious to take on salary — even for good players. Plus, let’s admit that the players they’ll be offering, at those prices, aren’t exactly enticing even in a healthy fiscal environment.

It seems the best of the very, very long shots might be working out a deal with Cleveland, trading Murphy for Big Z. This has been floated around the internet, but there’s really no reason to believe there’s any substance to it.  However, Murphy would make a nice complement to both Shaq and LeBron, and if Cleveland continues to unimpress, it might be do-able. Then again, Cleveland has already been mentioned as interested in trading for Stephen Jackson with the Warriors, but some reporters have noted the Cavs reluctance to give up Big Z due to both him being a big expiring deal ($11.5 million) they could use for something else later and “Shaq insurance,” meaning a back-up plan for the team in case Shaq gets hurt/doesn’t work out.

Ultimately, the Pacers can see the shore of cap relief ahead in the Summer of 2011, but the seas are getting rougher — and it is getting harder for the Pacers not to drown, financially, in sight of it.

pacers salary cap

The 2010-11 Salary Cap: Here Thar Be Monsters.

{ 1 comment }

From Mike Wells this morning:

The Pacers have turned in the paperwork to pick up the third-year option on Rush and Hibbert’s contracts.

This is no surprise, and I had noted their contract amounts in an earlier Cap & Trade.

Hibbert has shown some improvement over last year, averaging 7 points and just over 7 boards in his first two games.  However, he’s only shooting 44% and has looked very slow.  Fouling continues to limit his minutes and effectiveness, as he’s getting whistled for just under 7 fouls every 36 minutes.

Brandon Rush has started the first two games, or at least that’s the rumor.  I guess “non-existent” would be the polite way to describe his performance.

In any case, it’s far too early to know for sure what kind of players either of these guys will be, so the Pacers made the no-brainer move of picking up their options.

{ 0 comments }

Cap & Trade: Trick or Treat

by Tim Donahue on October 14, 2009 at 4:05 pm · 2 comments

Just a quick reminder that Halloween is a very meaningful date for the Pacers and a couple of their young players.  According to Larry Coon’s FAQ:

Teams have until the October 31 preceding the player’s second season to exercise their option for the player’s third season. Likewise, they have until the October 31 preceding the player’s third season to exercise their option for the player’s fourth season (see question number 50 for more information on options). If the team invokes both options (keeping the player for all four seasons) then the player becomes a restricted free agents following his fourth season (see question number 36 for more information on restricted free agency). If the team declines either option, then the player enters free agency as an unrestricted free agent.

So, as Pacer faithful, you should keep an eye out for the announcements on the disposition of the options for both Brandon Rush and Roy Hibbert.  According to ShamSports.com, Rush’s option is for $2,069,040, while Hibbert’s is for $1,685,280.  It is an almost foregone conclusion that these options will be picked up, but it’s pretty much the only suspense we have left going this preseason.

{ 2 comments }