Posts tagged as:

Danny Granger

Danny Excels During Team USA Scrimmage

by Jared Wade on August 15, 2010 at 12:27 pm

danny granger team usa

Saturday’s Team USA scrimmage vs. China was entertaining for the few onlookers inside Madison Square Garden. But more than anything, Danny Granger was just happy to play against some foreign competition after “beating up on each other for the past month,” as Granger put it.

And in the process, Granger may have also — finally — put to rest any “bubble” talk from analysts speculating whether or not Danny would make Team USA’s final, 12-man roster for the upcoming 2010 FIBA World Championship that start August 28 in Turkey. After the run, he himself admitted that it would he thinks it would be hard for anyone to leave him off the team after he went out and led the team with 22 points on 9/12 shooting, including 10 first quarter points (on 4/4 shooting) that helped set the tone for Team USA dominance.

His good shooting performance, along with two blocks during one four-minute stretch he had in the third quarter while playing out of the team’s 2-3 half-court zone and full-court zone press, should also put to rest any concerns about his finger, which he initially injured last week when his hand was caught in the net while playing defense. He originally thought the finger might be broken, or at least dislocated, but it turned out to just be a mild sprain, he said. Though he is still taping the ring and middle fingers of his shooting hand together and he admits “it was kind of weird,” just being aggressive out there helped him play so well Saturday.

“A lot of times, I’ve been passive and that’s not my game,” said Granger. “So I was going out there with that aggressive mentality.” Scorers gonna score, basically, was his mindset, as he added that he thinks every shot is a good shot.

It’s not just Granger that international defenses are going to have to worry about on the wing, of course,. Between him, Kevin Durant, Rudy Gay and Andre Iguodala, the team has a whole stable of potent, athletic scorers. “We all are scorers when we’re out there,” he said. “It’s great because we’re all athletic.”

The transition to the shorter three-point line has been an adjustment for Danny, but based on the way he shot Saturday, moving in a few feet certainly hasn’t done anything to take away his most lethal weapon. And for the personnel on this team overall, the shorter line might be a good thing—particularly for guys like Derrick Rose and Lamar Odom who have accurate shots from midrange but become more erratic from 24 feet. “We all have to go through that [adjustment],” said Granger. “For some of us who aren’t shooters, it’s better.”

As far as all the activity back in Indiana, Danny loved the deal the Pacers made to acquire Darren Collison, calling it “an excellent trade.” Now that Troy Murphy is out of the picture, he expects to play the four spot more often next season, although he does think Larry Bird will make another deal to acquire a true power forward. Him playing extended minutes at the four probably isn’t ideal – for him or the Pacers – but he noted that his “ability to shoot the ball, stretch the floor” will help the offense. “Coach likes that,” he said.

UPDATE: From what Danny knows about Darren, he thinks Jim O’Brien will like Darren’s long-distance shooting, too. “When he got drafted, I’m not sure they knew how good of a shooter he was,” said Granger. “But he ended up shooting 40% from three for the year.”

The other big change for Danny during his Team USA days has been his shoes. Along with Durant and Rondo, he is wearing the red, white and blue colorway Nike Hyperfuse. He never wore them last season but is impressed and enjoys that several of the guys are all wearing the same Star Spangled design.

{ 3 comments }

Danny Granger, Chris Paul and the Miami Heat

by Jared Wade on August 13, 2010 at 11:21 am

I’m just going to excerpt very liberally from this wonderful post because (a) Shoals weaved together a cohesive fabric of insights that can’t really be separated and remain as salient, and (b) you should be reading The Works regularly and maybe seeing this in its entirely will compel you to do so.

It remains to be seen whether Trevor Ariza will do right by NOLA. Or, to put it another way, whether Chris Paul will be one step closer to not leaving, and the era of the super-teams kept at bay. Certainly, the Hornets think so; in trading Darren Collison, they parted with the league’s ultimate contingency plan. But the Paul situation was getting thorny, the man wanted some help, and circumstances demanded sooner, not later.

Except while all eyes were on Paul, wondering if he would squander valuable prime on a team treading water, we forgot about Indiana’s Danny Granger.

It’s okay, most people do. And unlike Paul, Granger isn’t in contention for greatest ever at his position. Yet the new, harsh logic of the NBA goes something like this: the finest players are entitled to quality teams, or else, they will join forces and form encampments of their own.

Just because Danny Granger wasn’t asking for a trade, or seen as likely to make trouble before his 2014 free agency, it doesn’t mean he lives in a different league.

Chris Paul may have Trevor Ariza to toss alley-oops to, but Granger — who should see the playoffs a few times before he retires — is the star whose needs were really addressed. The irony, of course, is that we had all spent the last month guessing at Paul’s state of mind.

Granger, however shoddy the Pacers were, never raised a fuss or forced the issue. And yet he ended up the biggest winner in the trade.

Okay, it was the Pacers who won, since the team filled their most glaring need with a top-flight player. Teams are bigger than their stars; Collison could go on to surpass Granger; no one man is bigger than an entire roster, a whole that a point guard can bring real coherence to. Yet getting Darren Collison showed that the Pacers have been paying attention.

You can’t take your stars for granted, or leave them high and dry as other teams load up. Hate the Heat if you want; it’s because of them that Indiana made sure to make a move. In the end, it’s not about player demands, empowerment, expectations, or labor issues. It’s not about competitive imbalance. It’s about teams realizing that players want to win.

Yes, I know, making it too easy to win is a sin against the sport. The more important principle at play, though, is that talent is a terrible thing to waste. That goes for players who never become who they are; it should hold equally for franchises lucky enough to land Danny Granger late in the first round. He’s shown them loyalty by committing long-term. The least they can do is reward him as they would a Chris Paul potentially looking to bounce.

I have nothing to add.

{ 4 comments }

Paul George

The Pacers entered the night desperately in need of a point guard.  They left the night in pretty much the same shape.

Unable to complete a deal to land a point guard, the Pacers did pretty much as we said they’d do in this situation: drafted Paul George.  Though I would have liked filling that gaping hole at the point much better, I do like this pick.

George looks like a player who is ready to contribute offensively almost immediately, though it’s not entirely clear what position he’ll play.  Defensively, he needs to improve his mechanics and grow into his body, but he has the tools to be a special player at this level.  Maybe not this season, but down the road, he could be a force defensively on the wing.

This pick — really all of these picks — run somewhat counter to the Pacers’ recent history of drafting 4-year players from major programs.  Where Tyler Hansbrough, Brandon Rush, and Roy Hibbert all were reputed to be low risk, low reward players, George is certainly not that.  Here’s what DraftExpress’ Jonathan Givony tweeted in response to the Pacers’ selection:

Indiana finally grew a pair & stopped hitting singles. I begged my guy there to swing for the fences for once. That’s exactly what they did.

With their second pick (#40), the Pacers took an even bigger chance, selecting Lance Stephenson.  A solidly-built, 6-5 shooting guard from Cincinnati, Stephenson represents something of a baffling pick, to me.

lance-stephenson-bearcats-0e1d3f20ccd3cfa8_large

First, I’m not sure why they’d add another wing.  Second, Stephenson definitely is not the “milk drinker” type.  He was a top prospect a year ago coming out of high school — rated ahead of Wall, Cousins, and Favors by some scouting services — but had a somewhat lackluster freshman year.  He has a reputation of being a somewhat selfish player, and he has some red flags off the court.  This is a guy with a ton of talent, but almost as much baggage.   I’m not sure how he’ll work out coming into a pretty weak locker room in Indianapolis — at least from a player leadership standpoint.

Still, to be totally honest, I haven’t seen anywhere near enough to make a complete judgment.  Also, it seems that he did largely have his act together at UC — though his shot selection still leaves much to be desired.

So, those are the two wings.  The prayer comes in the form of Magnum Rolle — a fantastic name that comes attached to a skinny, 24-year old 6-10 power forward from Louisiana Tech.  The Pacers actually drafted Ryan Reid at #57 — who I suspect doesn’t really exist after trying to research him quickly — but traded Reid, along with cash, to Oklahoma City for Rolle, who had been taken with the 51st pick.

11-11-08MagnumRolle

Magnum looks like a quick, athletic shot blocker that could play well next to Hibbert — if he develops quite a bit.  He won’t ever be a banger, but he could be a decent weakside shot blocker.

The Christmas Wish

I had really wanted to see some clear signal of the direction Bird wants to take the Pacers.  Unfortunately, I’m still scratching my head a bit.  The Pacers have no point guard, and when asked about it, Bird simply said they’d work on it this summer.  From that perspective, I found draft night somewhat unsatisfying.

However, I do like the Paul George pick quite a bit.  Also, my more cautious angels are telling me not to confuse activity with accomplishment.  There is still a lot of summer left, so I’m sure there are still plenty of moves yet to be made.  Still, there’s not a lot here for Pacer fans to really embrace as bold steps forward.

Scuttlebutt

There were a bazillion rumors going on over the last few days, and it seems clear that none really came to fruition.  However, these three were interesting:

  • Flirting with Thunder
    One of the most persistent rumors over the last day was that the Oklahoma City Thunder was trying to acquire the #10 pick.  Probably my favorite scenario was getting back Eric Maynor, the #18, and the #21 picks in return for the #10 pick and filler.  It seems now that this was never a real possibility, but it sure sounded good at the time.  OKC ended up trading the #21 & #26 picks to New Orleans in return for the #11 (Cole Aldrich).  They also provided New Orleans with some much needed cap relief by taking back Morris Peterson and his contract.  Supposedly, the Pacers turned down a similar offer, where OKC would take T.J. Ford’s contract off our hands.  As tempting financially as that is, I think I’d rather roll the dice with Paul George.
  • Danny in Danger?
    A rumor popped up shortly before the draft that had the Pacers sending Danny Granger & the #10 to New Jersey in exchange for Devin Harris, Yi Jianlian, and the #3 — which the Pacers would use on Derrick Favors.  The deal didn’t seem to make a lot of sense for either team, to me, and Larry Bird vehemently denied any such deal.  Still, plenty of true things have been vehemently denied, so I’m not real sure what to make of that.  Right now, I’ll just decide to be glad it didn’t happen, and move on.
  • Bobcat Deal Revisited?
    After the selection of Lance Stephenson, I had tweeted that I thought the Pacers might revisit a rumored deal with Charlotte, sending T.J. Ford and Brandon Rush out for a package that might included Raymond Felton as the solution at the point.  I don’t know how feasible it is, and more importantly, I don’t know how desirable it would be.  However, it is interesting in light of this little twitter exchange Brandon Rush as the Pacers picked:

tweet

There’s little reason to believe that Brandon is aware of any imminent deal, but the Pacers now have six wings (Granger, Rush, Dunleavy, D Jones, George, and Stephenson), seven bigs (Hibbert, Murphy, Foster, Hansbrough, McRoberts, S Jones, and Rolle) to go with basically zero functional point guards.  It seems only reasonable that something has to give.  Doesn’t it?

desert-wandering

So, perhaps we should rethink that left turn at Albuquerque.

{ 3 comments }