Posts tagged as:

Game #4

Game #4 Recap: More Brick, But in a Good Way

by Jared Wade on November 5, 2009 at 11:30 am · 1 comment

In a lot of ways, last night in MSG was just more of the same for Indiana: wretched shooting from the outside, turnovers for days and a lot of guys standing around the perimeter waiting for someone else to do something to make the pain go away.

But in one very important way last night was completely different: the Pacers won.

With a half-stingy-defense/half-the-Knicks-were-just-missing-shots effort throughout the second half that held New York to just 33 points over the final 24 minutes combined with a concerted effort by Danny Granger to become the focal point of the offense, the Pacers were able to overcome the same problems that marked their three losses this season to pick up their first win.

Danny has been shooting threes like Dale Davis for the past three outings (going 2/8, 2/10 and 3/12, respectively), but he finally seemed to accept the fact that weird things — Twilight Zone things — were afoot and left the confines of the arc. He used shot fakes and hesitation moves increasingly throughout the second half to get into the paint, where he was either able to find a good shot for himself or create one for a teammate. He recorded just 4 assists in the process, but the numbers don’t account for what he did more often — make a pass that forced the defense to start scrambling so that, after another pass or two, the Pacers got a good look.

(Notably, this is what Mike Dunleavy used to do constantly in 2007-08, and why his absence from the offense can’t be overstated. Honestly, the Pacers lose something when you don’t have Danny on the wing doing what he does best, but Danny taking over that MDJ role and becoming more of a creator than a finisher could inject some new life into an offense that has been extremely unproductive for four games. Keep a look-out for this. It will be significant. Danny might have to start doing things he didn’t have to last year, which might in turn make him even better than last year. His scoring numbers might drop a little and people will start saying “WHHHAAT’S GOING ON” about that, but if he becomes more dynamic with the ball and learns new ways to create offense for the whole team, he will be a better player. Don’t let anyone tell you differently.)

When Danny fouled out with 3:38 to play, it was obviously troublesome. But no matter. TJ Ford was there. Yes, the same TJ Ford who after the first two games had a negative PER and was statistically the worst PG in the NBA.

TJ took the offensive reins and the team didn’t miss a beat, as Ford dropped in 8 of his 16 total points after Danny went to the bench.

And it could be argued that all this was kick-started by Dahntay Jones.

For the fourth straight game, the Pacers offense has generally followed this same series of events: Everyone stands around the perimeter missing shots. No one tries anything else. Players miss more shots. Dahntay Jones goes one-on-one and tries to make something happen, scoring a bucket or two and making everyone who watched him last year in Denver say “WTF? How that happen?” No one else on the team does much of anything else. Dahntay Jones aggressively tries to get to the hoop again and this time fails miserably.

Rinse and repeat.

And this is what was happening in the first half last night as well, with Dahntay maintaining a higher level of success in forays with the ball in this game than he did in the previous three. He seems to be adopting the role that Jarrett Jack carved out for himself last season. While I really hope Dahntay’s aggression doesn’t become as critical to this offense as Jack’s did last season, his willingness to attack the hoop should be praised, particularly when considering just how unwilling everyone else on the roster has been to do anything with the ball so far this year. (The second half of last night notwithstanding, anyway.)

And this has shown, albeit it only over a short time frame, a pretty significant difference between Dahntay’s approach to the game a guy like Brandon Rush’s approach. Buried in Bob Kravitz’s ramblings about people not talking to him were some thoughts from Jim O’Brien that helps illustrate the point I will attempt to make.

“We’re not getting (ball reversal), we’re not running the passing game enough through the elbow area and we find ourselves sometimes standing and watching one another,” coach Jim O’Brien said. “When we do move, we’re getting the shots we want, but 3-for-22 (from behind the 3-point arc) is not who we are as a shooting team.”

He continued.

“I think the first unit has moved fairly decently, frankly,” he said. “The newer guys, even though they’re talented offensively, don’t yet have an understanding of what we’re trying to get done with our passing game.”

When that stagnation happens, there are two general approaches a wing player can take. Brandon Rush has seemed to become frustrated, sullen, confused and start giving off a woe-is-me vibe. Surrounded by a floundering, inoperative offense showing no signs of productivity, he turns into Eeyore.

It’s raining. Oh, bother.*

Whereas Dahntay sees the same situation and, despite knowing full well that his personal offensive arsenal is very limited, starts thinking “I DON’T KNOW WHAT’S GOING ON NOR DO I KNOW WHAT I SHOULD BE DOING NOR EVEN WHERE I AM REALLY — BUT I’M STANDING HERE HOLDING THIS ORANGE ROUND SPHERE SO I SHALL RUN TOWARDS THE IRON AND GLASS TARGET IN FRONT OF ME. WHY IS MY INNER MONOLOGUE YELLING? I DON’T KNOW. LOUD NOISES.”

He doesn’t dwell. He doesn’t think. He just turns into Brick Tamland from Anchorman and follows his instincts. He kills a guy with a trident.

Then he puts the ball on the deck and tries not to get called for an offensive foul as he runs for the hoop with the grace Earl Campbell. In Mike Wells’ piece talking about Dahntay’s aggression, Dahntay himself added some more insight on his willingness to attack the basket through three games.

“That’s definitely the reason behind some of my turnovers,” Jones said. “I’m still trying to make the best decision with the ball. The most challenging part is seeing how I can compliment [sic] the guys around me. I haven’t played that much with them.”

As someone just watching, it looks like his decision on how to *complement* the guys around him, more times than not, is to just realize that those guys aren’t going to take any initiative. So he takes it himself. Like I said before, hopefully this doesn’t become a permanent fixture of the offense. Cause I think even he knows that he is not the most qualified to do so. Don’t get me wrong. I like Dahntay. He brings a lot to the team. But despite his 19 points on 15 shots last night, the team is not going to be sniffing the playoffs if he has to be a primary offensive weapon — with “has to be” being the key part of that concept.

To me, however, it looked like he inspired Danny to pick up the slack. Danny honestly looked nothing but shocked and perplexed for the previous 10 straight quarters as he missed wide open three after wide open three after wide open three. Hell, I was shocked, too.

But it seemed that after seeing Dahntay continually force things and try to create seams in the defense where no real seams existed, it all clicked for Danny. “Hey, I’m way more talented with the ball than him and he keeps getting into the paint while I stand out here chipping orange paint off the rim. Wait? Maybe I should try that. It might just work”

Try he did. And succeed he did as well.

Then when Danny fouled out, in came TJ to do the same thing. It was great to watch and hopefully it will be a lesson that translates to games against teams that aren’t the Knicks.

Two final, unconnected thoughts:

Hibbert’s touches on the block were all great to watch. His effectiveness with a jump hook that increasingly looks like a legitimate weapon in this league can bring a new component to this offense that really didn’t exist last season. Even when he doesn’t score, the defense is forced to rotate while he is making his move, which helps to open up shooters on the perimeter. Thus far, no one on the roster aside from Earl Watson can make even open shots, so that part of this hasn’t exactly led to points, but these guys are good shooters so that will turn around. Has to.

And lastly, I should have talked about the defense more. It was very good last night and, actually, has been since the Atlanta game. The Knicks were held to an eFG% of .436 last night, which is phenomenal. And if you take the Atlanta game out, the Pacers opponent’s eFG% for the season is a paltry .451, which is excellent.

* In fairness to Brandon, he was better last night for some stretches than he had been in the prior three. And he wasn’t the only one playing the Eeyore role for the first 14 quarters of the season. Danny, Luther Head, TJ and even Troy all were guilty quite often as well.

brick

More Brick Tamland, less Eeyore.

{ 1 comment }

Game #4 Preview: Need Win, Will Travel

by Jared Wade on November 4, 2009 at 5:20 pm · 1 comment

Indiana Pacers @ New York Knicks
Madison Square Garden
New York, New York
7:30 PM EST

Pacers vs. Wizards
1-3 Record 2-3
98.7 (26th) Offensive Rating 108.8 (10th)
106.4 (14th) Defensive Rating 108.1 (19th)
0.471 (19th) eFG% 0.494 (15th)
0.483 (13th) Opponent's eFG% 0.476 (11th)
97.8 (3rd) Pace 90.6 (24th)

Glossary: Offensive Rating | Defensive Rating | eFG% | Pace

The Pacers need a win. Badly.

There has never been a must-win game in the history of November basketball, so let’s not get carried away, but leaguewide, Indiana is joined by only New Jersey and Golden State in the winless category. More importantly, the team has looked inept on both ends of the floor.

Defensively, few people outside of the confines of Conseco Fieldhouse realistically thought the team was going to be anything better than below-average. Even offensively, it’s not like the team was a juggernaut of efficiency or anything last season — they just took a lot of shots and, thus, made a lot of shots.

But regardless of the 2008-09 team’s middling offensive talent, they certainly put points on the board. Indy’s 105.1 ppg was good for 5th best in the league (albeit at only 108.1 points per 100 possessions, which was 18th best in the NBA). Through three games this season, however, they have dropped that average down to 95.0 ppg (21st in the NBA) and an utterly embarrassing 97.9 points per 100 possessions.

A lot of this is sample size, obviously.

We’re still only talking about three games (against three 2008-09 playoff teams nonetheless) and much of the meager scoring output can be attributed to just plain old bad shooting. Let’s not let Danny Granger off the hook completely here because a true upper echelon basketball player would put the ball on the deck and get to the hoop/foul line when he is struggling, but Danny has missed a ton of threes that he normally makes. At 3/13 and 2/10 from behind the arc the last two games, sure, he’s taking to many threes. But three-point shooting is his primary weapon out there.

Fortunately, the Knicks have been fairly bad themselves so far in the early goings. Aside from Danilo Gallinari (who leads the NBA in three-point makes and takes) shooting an eye-popping 45.2% from three and David Lee doing all the David Lee stuff he does while posting a Shaq-in-his-primesque 62.8% from the field, there’s not a ton for Coach D’Antoni to get excited about.

Still, I haven’t personally seen much of the Knicks yet this year aside from the opening night blow-out they received from the Heat. So for a little more perspective on what the Pacers can expect this evening, I reached out to Mike Kurylo of KnickerBlogger fame. He’s one of the better stat-oriented guys when it comes to discussing the league at large and knows Indy’s New York rivals as well as anyone.

Here’s what he has to say. Per usual, I brought the Qs, Mike dropped the As.

knickerblogger

The Knicks  are 1-3 after getting blown out by Miami and Philly, dropping a close one to Charlotte and, most recently, beating up on Chris Paul and the Hornets. How has the team looked overall and what prompted that 40-point fourth quarter outburst that help you take down New Orleans?

Overall the Knicks have looked poor. In each of the first three games they’ve had 20+ point deficits. One of the changes against New Orleans was to insert Gallinari into the lineup. His hot three-point shooting opened the inside up for David Lee and Chris Duhon to run the pick & roll. In the first three games, teams were able to collapse in the middle, which made the team more one dimensional. I documented this on my blog today, showing how opponents are giving the Knicks the outside shot (namely Wilson Chandler) in lieu of letting them score in the paint.

Much like last year, Coach D’Antoni has his boys chucking threes and putting up points. Why the terrible 28.8% on threes? Is it just missing open looks like the Pacers 27.0%? Or something else? The personnel is just about the same, and Danilo Gallinari, who is leading the NBA in attempts, has hit 45% of his shots from behind the arc?

The team has had some open looks, but haven’t been able to get them to fall. Another problem is a lack of a true shooting guard. Wilson Chandler is not a strong outside shooter. Meanwhile, Larry Hughes and Nate Robinson are more effective as slashers. New York runs an offense that relies on shooting as one main component, and they lack a shooting guard.

What’s up with Nate Robinson? His numbers are gross?

Nate really hasn’t seen a lot of minutes — he’s just a tad above Jared Jeffries in minutes per game. I think he’ll be his normal productive self once he gets back from injury and once he sees some real court time.

How are the rest of the guys looking? Our old friend Al Harrington had 42 the other night but has been pretty bad otherwise. Wilson Chandler is shooting badly as well. Other than David Lee and Danilo is there anyone else who has been playing well that Pacer fans should be worried about tonight?

Al Harrington scores, but doesn’t contribute much else. Danilo Gallinari looks pretty good. Not only is he lighting it up from outside, but he’s shown good court vision and some ability to take his guy off the dribble — although I expect him to be inconsistent at this young age. David is great at scoring in the paint and grabbing rebounds but has been pretty bad defensively. Darko has shown good passing in the half court set, but his defense at the 5 is less than advertised, and he hasn’t gotten a lot of burn. Larry Hughes is playing out of his mind, but you know that has to stop. And be prepared for the Jared Jeffries three-point onslaught!

Looking at the defensive stats, the Knicks are currently 28th in defensive efficiency while the Pacers are 26th. Any predictions on final score? Will there be stop all night?

No prediction, but I don’t expect a lot of defense from either team.

{ 1 comment }