Posts tagged as:

Game Previews

After falling in Detroit, the Indiana Pacers bounced back against the New Jersey Nets on Monday in a 108-94 victory. Paul George showed up with 21 points and Dahntay Jones impressed off the bench as Indy cruised to 4-1. Then again, we shouldn’t make too much of this victory. I mean, the Nets did have some key players out, most notably Brook Lopez and Kris Humphries.

Tonight, Indiana faces its toughest contest of the young season, as they head over to Miami. As many of you may remember, Indiana got a victory over the revamped Heat squad last season in their first meeting on the road. The other match-ups throughout the year resulted in some close turn-outs, and I expect another close one this evening.

The Heat were on a roll out of the gate — but that came to a quick halt Monday in a 100-92 loss to the Atlanta Hawks. Atlanta had big help from Tracy McGrady, who came up big in the fourth to bring Miami its first loss. The Hawks slowed down the Heat, holding them to a season-low 92 possessions. They were averaging over 101 before the game.

The Hawks broke out a zone defense on LeBron, Dwyane and Bosh, and that was the key to stopping this high-powered squad. Wade, in particular, struggled, going 4-of-17. Speaking of which, this brings us to a big match-up tonight: Paul George vs. D-Wade.

PG is coming off a great shooting game and the 6’10″ guard and will be asked to cover a guy quite a bit smaller than him. George did well helping on Deron Williams at times last night, and I expect to see him do well — as well as anyone can, anyway — when he guards Wade tonight.

Miami’s transition offense wasn’t operating so well either, if you take a look at the chart below from TrueHoop:

The Heat were also bullied in the paint, being out-scored 50-38 after previously only allowing average of 32.6 points down low per game. As we saw in the game, Miami does have a problem against the zone, and many opposing coaches are hoping to replicate Atlanta’s game plan. Hopefully, Indiana noticed. Although the Pacers really haven’t played zone defense this year, this could be the proper time.

Boston used it, and almost made a huge comeback the other night. If Minnesota and Charlotte had tried, perhaps we could see the Heat at 3-3 right now. Either way, zone defense so far looks like it is the key to stopping this high-powered offense. So as we watch the game tonight, look out for the Pacers defense if they play zone or not.

{ 2 comments }

The Indiana Pacers today face off against the Eastern Conference-leading Boston Celtics. Throughout the media, much praise has been heaped upon the Celtic defense, with buzzwords such as “teamwork” and “efficiency” commonly, yet vaguely, being used to describe this excellent basketball team. With the help of advanced statistics, however, we can attempt to shed some light on a few of the many reasons for Boston’s success, and conversely, the related implications for the Pacers today.

The Celtics’ defense has constantly been praised for the last four years as being one of the most stifling in the league. At first glance, however, it appears that this truly is not the case. After all, they are nearly last in the NBA in blocks per game, and even when factoring in other stats such as charges and steals (measured through defensive play rate, an advanced formula which also takes into account related markers [ie possessions, free throws etc]), the picture is still seemingly mediocre.

In spite of this, Boston’s defense is still lauded as one of the best, and a deeper analysis shows why such a categorization is in fact astute. Consider, for instance, an analysis of the Celtics’s defense from a shooting perspective: Boston forces the opposition into jump shots on 71% of non-turnover possessions, while allowing close-range shots just 24% of the time, one of the better values in the league. Of course, this is meaningless if the shots are not well-defended, and so it is also important to note that not only do they encourage jumpshots, but also that they yield a mere 42.6% effective field goal percentage on jump shots. This indicates that the Celtics are playing high-level defense even when they are unable to force a turnover (as mentioned before, these percentages apply only to possessions resulting in a field goal attempt), and so when one sums/takes into account other metrics such as steals and charges, the defensive prowess of the Celtics becomes very visible indeed.

Of course, any discussion of Boston’s defense would be incomplete without mentioning their ability to defend the paint, and for good reason: the Celtics allow just a 52.6% effective field goal percentage on close-range shots, one of the best marks in the league. Part of this is likely due to their ability to effectively harass the opposing team’s pivot man. Specifically, opposing centers are being held to an effective field goal percentage of just 46.7%, a commendable number.

All of these figures are of particular importance to the Pacers. Although they 72% of their shots are jumpers, Indiana’s effective field goal percentage on jump shots against all opponents is 44.5%, and so we can see here from a statistical standpoint the difficult time the Pacers are likely going to have tonight in terms of scoring the basketball. It is worth noting, however, that even if the Celtics’ are able to bother Pacer pivot man Roy Hibbert in a fashion akin to the manner that they’ve harassed opposing centers all season, Hibbert may in fact not experience such an extraordinarily bad shooting performance, as he is currently shooting 45.9 percent against all teams, which isn’t too far off from the 46.7 percent that the Celtics hold opposing centers to.

Also of concern to the Pacers tonight in particular is the fact that although star Celtic guard Rajon Rondo is not expected to play, the defense still is quite adept. In the two player rotations that Boston has used the most when Rondo is out of the game, backup guard Nate Robinson has manned the point guard spot, and in fact, when this is the case, the unit’s number of points allowed per possession is actually lower than allowed by the two lineups most commonly used when Rondo plays.

In spite of Celtic’s proficiency on defense, however, let us end on an optimistic note: Although Boston has a winning record of all types of teams, they have won by the least number of average points to teams that rank in the top third in terms of effective field goal percentage allowed. This bodes well for the Pacers, as they are one of the top teams in the League in terms of forcing opponents into shooting a low percentage.

Ultimately, this (and any) basketball match-up can be dissected to infinity. It is prudent here, thus, to bring an end to all this statistical speculation, and simply let the cards fall where they may, simply hoping for the best:

Pacers vs Celtics. Conseco Fieldhouse. 7:00 pm

Jay Ganatra is a contributor to 8 Points, 9 Seconds who is currently studying accounting at the University of Florida. You can reach Jay at jay.ganatra@ufl.edu.

Pacers vs Celtics By the Numbers

Celtics vs Pacers
23-5 (1st) Record (Conf Rank) 13-15 (7th)
10-4 (Road) Home / Road Records 8-7 (Home)
Won 1 Current Streak Lost 1
4-1 Last 5 Head-to-Head 1-4
+8.75 (2nd) Point Differential (Rank) 0.00 (16th)
108.5 (11th) Offensive Rating (Rank) 102.8 (24th)
53.4% (1st) eFG% (Rank) 49.0% (17th)
99.0 (1st) Defensive Rating (Rank) 102.8 (8th)
46.8% (2nd) Opponent's eFG% (Rank) 47.0% (3rd)
91.0 (22nd) Pace (Rank) 94.8 (8th)

{ 1 comment }

Game #27 Preview: DC vs. CP3

by Jared Wade on December 20, 2010 at 4:56 pm · 0 comments

New Orleans Hornets @ Indiana Pacers
Monday, December 20, 2010
7:00 pm EST
Conseco Fieldhouse
Indianapolis, Indiana

The best point guard on the planet is coming to Conseco Fieldhouse, which we just found out will not be renamed for CNO Financial (the new name of the re-branded sponsor company). This is perfect timing considering the trade proposal that 8 Points, 9 Seconds recently proposed to a Hornets 24/7 blogger during a game preview Q&A.

24/7: You are the Pacers GM and the Hornets are on the phone. We already made one deal this summer, make me another offer that benefits both teams.

Tim Donahue: We give you Conseco Fieldhouse to play in. We get Chris Paul. We’ll even deliver.

Seems fair to me.

I’m pretty tapped out for the day on this whole Pacers blogging thing, but you can read the rest of that Q&A for more on Darren Collison, James Posey and Tyler Hansbrough. If you’re not impressed enough already by CP3, check out this post on how well Chris Paul is doing so far this year statistically. Tragically, the sister and cousin of Hornets reserve guard Willie Green both died in a car accident last night on the way home from his game against the Detroit Pistons.

Our deepest sympathies go out to Willie and his family.

Pacers vs Hornets By the Numbers

Hornets vs Pacers
16-11 (7th) Record (Conf Rank) 12-14 (7th)
5-8 (Road) Home / Road Records 6-6 (Home)
Lost 1 Current Streak Lost 1
5-0 Last 5 Head-to-Head 0-5
+2.15 (10th) Point Differential (Rank) +0.50 (16th)
103.8 (23rd) Offensive Rating (Rank) 103.5 (24th)
49.1% (17th) eFG% (Rank) 49.4% (16th)
101.4 (3rd) Defensive Rating (Rank) 102.9 (8th)
48.3% (10th) Opponent's eFG% (Rank) 47.1% (4th)
90.2 (27th) Pace (Rank) 94.6 (8th)

{ 0 comments }

Game #20 Preview: Buck Hunting

by Jared Wade on December 8, 2010 at 2:49 pm · 0 comments

Indiana Pacers @ Milwaukee Bucks
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
8:00 pm EST
Bradley Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

The 2010-11 Pacers look like the 2009-10 Bucks. Last year, Milwaukee was the darling team that everyone dug, mostly due to its quick, electric young point guard and its fundamentally sound, rapidly evolving center. Well, Brandon Jennings may have had more to do with the Bucks’ rise last year than Darren Collison has for this season’s Pacers, but the speedy floor general along with the still-improving Roy Hibbert have been the biggest factors.

And now, as Milwaukee tailspins amid preseason expectations, the Pacers have taken their moniker as Central Division surprise artists. Interestingly, they are also doing it the same way: with defense. The Bucks were the leagues 2nd best defensive squad last season, only allowing 103.1 points per 100 possessions and only allowing opponents to shoot an eFG% of 48.6% (good for 8th best in the NBA). This year’s Pacers are the 7th best defensive team in the NBA, allowing an even-better 102.8 points per 100 possessions while surrendering an eFG% of 46.8% (good for 3rd best).

This year’s Bucks team is similarly tough in terms of allowing buckets — they are 5th best with 101.8 points per 100. But the reason they are struggling so mightily to win games is that their offense has fallen off a cliff. In terms of both points per possession and eFG%, they are the worst offense in the NBA.

A lot of this can probably be attributed to the struggles of John Salmons. The great Bucks blog Brew Hoop had a good post detailing exactly why Salmons might be playing so much worse than he did for Milwaukee last season. For Pacers fans hoping their team wins tonight, this is the key takeaway.

What does seem clear is Salmons’ importance to the Bucks’ bottom line. The former Miami star has averaged 17.0 ppg, 3.7 apg, and 3.9 rpg on .467/.435/.758 shooting in seven Bucks wins, but just 10.2 ppg, 2.7 apg, and 3.3 rpg on some seriously terrible .318/.306/.771 shooting in 12 losses.

If Indiana can keep Salmons in check tonight in Milwaukee, that would seem to be the first step to beating the Bucks, something the Pacers couldn’t even do on their own court on November 5 — despite the fact that their best player, Andrew Bogut, didn’t even dress that night. In fact, beating the Bucks isn’t something the Pacers have done much of at all even dating back to last season. They were swept in their four meetings last season and are only 3-7 in their last 10 match-ups.

Of course, the November loss came before we knew that this year’s Indy team might be good and before we knew that this year’s Bucks team might be bad. Now, both teams are gleefully or painfully (respectively) aware of their current situations.

Whether this can reverse the recent fortune for Indiana vs. Milwaukee is unknown.

But we will find out in a few hours.

Pacers vs Bucks By the Numbers

Bucks vs Pacers
7-13 (10th) Record (Conf Rank) 10-9 (7th)
5-5 (Home) Home / Road Records 5-4 (Road)
Lost 1 Current Streak Won 1
5-0 Last 5 Head-to-Head 0-5
-2.00 (20th) Point Differential (Rank) +3.00 (9th)
99.6 (30th) Offensive Rating (Rank) 106.0 (18th)
44.1% (30th) eFG% (Rank) 50.8% (10th)
101.8 (5th) Defensive Rating (Rank) 102.8 (7th)
48.7% (11th) Opponent's eFG% (Rank) 46.8% (3rd)
90.8 (23rd) Pace (Rank) 94.6 (8th)

{ 0 comments }