Posts tagged as:

Mike Wells

For a while now, there have been a lot of hints that there are some serious chemistry issues in the Pacers’ locker room. With so many young players and no established leader, that isn’t exactly shocking. But it seems as though things have reached a boiling point.

And Larry Bird sounds to be pretty fed up with the nonsense, reports Mike Wells.

Player professionalism is being questioned. Some players have begun arriving for practice just before the scheduled start time. Others constantly joke around during workouts.

The lack of commitment in practice is showing up in games. The Pacers have lost by at least 10 points in five of their past seven defeats.

“You have to have the players behind you and they have to be willing to work hard,” Bird said. “I know what’s going on; the players know what’s going on. We’re just not getting the effort.”

Even more scathingly, Bird said that, not only does he “know what’s going on” — he tried to fix it at the trade deadline.

“Our problem is internally,” Bird said. “I see what’s going on inside the locker room. I’ve seen a lot of it all year. I tried to address it with different people at the trade deadline.”

Bird was unable to move T.J. Ford, Solomon Jones, Brandon Rush or Josh McRoberts, who has not been a locker room disruption, before the trade deadline last month.

I’ve only been inside Indiana’s locker room a handful of times this year, so I have no actual, first-hand understanding of this team’s collective mental make-up. Just following the logic of what Larry is saying, however, it stands to reason that at least one of the players who was reportedly almost shipped to Memphis or New Orleans at the trade deadline was part of the problem (or at least Bird’s perception of the problem).

Then again, who knows? When Bird said he tried to “address it” at the deadline, he may have been referring to another, unreported, failed deal that we never heard about. Lance Stephenson, most notably during and after the atrocious loss in Houston last week, has been at the center of recent displays of internal animosity, so perhaps Larry shopped the troubled, talented youngster to other GMs across the league to no avail?

I’m just speculating here based on Larry’s comments.

But as Tom Lewis of Indy Cornrows rightfully points out, these are Larry Bird’s players. So ultimately, he, as the man who acquired every last player on this roster, has to take some responsibility for the way that the guys have essentially stopped being competitive since the All-Star break. If the team is “just not getting the effort” from these players during a playoff race then it’s quite possible that these simply are not the right players.

And that — on top of the ongoing, tedious, dramatic soap opera that this season has become — likely means that the players are not the only ones with a waning interest in whether or not Indiana makes the postseason.

I’m sure many fans feel the same way.

{ 3 comments }

There isn’t a ton of info here from Grizzlies owner Michael Heisley on what exactly happened, but he has told NBA reporter extraordinaire David Aldridge that Memphis was fully on board and did not pull out.

Memphis Grizzlies owner Michael Heisley said Thursday that he and his team did not pull out of a proposed deal that would have sent guard O.J. Mayo to the Indiana Pacers in exchange for power forward Josh McRoberts and a first-round pick.

“Indiana was not able to get it all together,” Heisley said in a telephone interview. “People are going to say I have reservations (about the proposed trade). I think from our point of view, we were interested in the trade going forward. It was a very, very difficult conversation for us. It took us a long time to decide. We were getting a lot of players at the two and three position and we were getting a little skinny at the four. We had three candidates we were looking at and when we decided on one, O.J. had to be part of that trade. It wasn’t that we were anxious to get rid of him.”

Like I said … not a lot of insight into exactly why Indy wasn’t able to “get it all together.” My entirely speculative guess is that it has to do with the fact that the NBA trading deadline is insane and phones are ringing off the hook all day for basically every GM in the league. Meanwhile, Memphis was also busy acquiring Shane Battier and dealing away Hasheem Thabeet so it’s not exactly like the Pacers had their full attention.

And according to Indy Star Pacers beat writer Mike Wells, there was a third team involved, New Orleans, and they were the one that pulled out at the last minute.

Call was logged at 3:01 p.m. and Orleans was involved, but they were the team that pulled out, according to a source. Rush was going to N.O.

The fact that the call came after the 3:00 pm deadline may have also been a factor here, as multiple sources were implying earlier. Who knows? Certainly not an idiot with no league sources such as myself.

UPDATE: Here’s more from the Grizzlies side on what exactly happened, the following coming from reporter Ronald Tillery of Memphis’ Commercial Appeal. (via SBnation)

After spending all of the time and energy it took to convince Griz owner Michael Heisley to agree to trade O.J. Mayo to Indiana, the deal fell through because the teams didn’t make the NBA’s 2 p.m. deadline.

Here’s why: Memphis and Indiana agreed to swap Mayo for forward Josh McRoberts and a first-round pick but Indiana insisted on making it a three-way trade to make the deal work financially.

In the final minutes leading up to the deadline, the New Orleans Hornets pulled out. Indiana recruited another team to keep it a three-team transaction. And there’s the rub. By the time the “other” third team got involved and everything was agreed upon everyone missed the deadline.

The NBA trade deadline is a hard one. Missing it by 30 seconds might as well be missing it by 5 hours.

The fact that Indiana “insisted” on tailoring the deal to their financial needs makes it seem that, yeah, the Pacers dropped the ball here more so than it just being too difficult to work things out with Memphis. Then again, how could this work financially with just OJ and McRoberts? OJ is making $4.5 million while Josh is making less than $1 million. The salaries wouldn’t work even if the Pacers threw in Brandon Rush, who was reportedly headed to the Hornets in the three-team proposal.

Once again … Who knows?

I’m sure we will hear from the Pacers front office on the particulars eventually. (UPDATE: Bird is being evasive so far.) In the meantime, I rather enjoyed Indy fan Bubbamania’s reaction to the fact that New Orleans may have been the saboteur in this deal happening.

NBA screws pacers again, since they run N.O

Could might be, Bubba. Could might be.

Lastly, Roy Hibbert’s got jokes, too.

{ 9 comments }

The Pacers’ January Defensive Letdown

by Jared Wade on January 28, 2011 at 10:58 am · 1 comment

In recapping the Pacers loss to the Magic, I tried to illustrate just how poorly the Pacers have been playing on the defensive end of late. Here’s a refresher.

They have given up at least 97 points in each of the past six outings, a stretch of futility during which they have allowed an average of 108.7 points per game. The FG% defense isn’t any better with an average FG% allowed of 49.0%. The one good showing came up in Portland, where they held the Blazers to 42.2%, but the other five squads have all shot north of 45% — with four of them finishing above the 50% mark. (The worst was the 54.3% allowed to the Clippers.) And they haven’t been much better protecting the perimeter, giving up at least 10 threes in each of their last three games.

This is weird because the team was excellent defensively in November and still borderline elite throughout December. But now, it seems as if the team has begun to concentrate so much on repairing its broken offense that they lost focus on the one thing that could help turn this season around.

Mike Wells decided to ask the team exactly what is going on.

“It’s like we’re overly concerned with our offense because it’s been a struggling point for us, that we’re slipping on defense,” swingman Mike Dunleavy said. “We need to get back to defending the way we’re capable of.”We just need to worry about the offense secondarily, because I think we’ve tried so hard to solve that, we’ve neglected the defense and now we’re not doing either one well.”

Danny Granger identified what is the most obvious reason for the recent defensive futility: Roy Hibbert has not played well enough to keep himself on the court, and the team is much harder to score on when he is clogging up the interior.

“Roy hasn’t been playing a lot lately,” forward Danny Granger said. “Roy used to give us a back line of defense when teams would drive on us. We’ve also had so many different lineup changes, too. That plays a part in messing up our schemes.”

Regardless of the “why?” question, the team now looks to have a below average defense to go along with one of the worst offenses in the league. A lot of teams have made the playoffs with a terrible offense and a high-level defense. Conversely, a lot of other teams have made the playoffs with a high-level offense and a terrible defense.

But to my knowledge, no teams have ever made the playoffs with both a terrible offense and a terrible defense. And I don’t see that trend changing — so the Pacers are going to have to pick it up on at least one side of the ball if they want to play more than 82 games this season.

{ 1 comment }

We really had no intention of talking about the coach of this team so much this week. I agree with Tim’s assessment that Jim O’Brien’s continual rotation-tinkering has been a problem for the Pacers this season but that it is not the problem.

Besides, this year’s team is playing the best defense any Indiana club has since 2006, so he has to be doing something right. You don’t just trip and fall into being a top ten defensive team. (Although the weak defensive efforts we have seen all too often in January are obviously a troubling sign that this early-season ranking might soon look hollow.)

I guess the issue of how this team is being coached just something that has been on a lot of people’s minds this week now that we officially enter the second half of the regular season.

Mike Wells sat down with O’Brien for a Q&A on the state of the team and his role in that. Among the topics discussed are the rotation-tinkering, Roy Hibbert’s struggles, transitioning to a “youth movement” and his future with the Pacers after the next 41 games.

Q: Is it frustrating that you’re at the halfway point of the season and still adjusting the lineup?

A: It’s not frustrating. You’re trying to find the right balance and the right rotation that will allow you to play winning basketball. If you’re not playing winning basketball, then you’re always going to tinker with the lineup. Nobody gets a free pass from the standpoint of their playing time. If people are not playing at the level where I feel it gives us the best chance of winning, then I’ll adjust. You have Danny (Granger), who is going to get his minutes. Darren (Collison) is playing at a pretty good and consistent level. Other than that, I’m trying to find the right combinations.

Q: You have players going from being inactive to getting minutes in the rotation. Can you explain your rationale behind it?

A: It does change because we’re looking for the right combinations and you can’t dress everybody. I’m constantly looking at different situations. The guys know that. For an example, I’m looking at Paul (George) to see if he can give us more of a consistency than what we’re getting from Brandon (Rush). What you can’t do with a young team where the majority of the players are of equal levels of talent, is if they’re not playing at the level you think they need to be playing at, you need to make changes. I’m never going to hesitate to do that, and I’ve shown that.

Like with these responses, there isn’t a lot in O’Brien’s answers to Wells’ other questions that is surprising or particularly illuminating, but head over to the Star to read six more questions and answers. It’s nice to at least see O’Brien willing to respond to the most prevalent criticisms I’ve heard fans throw at him.

{ 1 comment }