Posts tagged as:

Milwaukee Bucks

Up by three after three (75-72), the Pacers once again looked like they were going to fall apart in the final quarter on Saturday night against the Bucks. For regular viewers, this wasn’t surprising. It has happened so many time this year that it essentially became an expected, running gag to punctuate every game. It was like the “Oh my God — they killed Kenny. You bastards” moment you knew was coming.

Let’s not get it confused. This isn’t why they lost so many games in December and January. It wasn’t like they were a very good team that just turned into a pumpkin late. There were plenty of games were they were outplayed throughout and somehow hung around only to revert to also-ran, steamroller-fodder when the other team started paying attention enough to properly execute late.

Regardless, this team has blown a lot of fourth quarter leads this year.

And on Saturday night, they missed 7 of their first 7 shots in the final period. So when Milwaukee forward/best-name-in-the-NBA-haver Luc Richard Mbah a Moute hit two free throws to put the Bucks up by 1 just three minutes into the final period, a “here we go again” vibe” surfaced.

Then a funny thing happened on the way to an expected collapse: Indiana went on a 14-0 run and ended up running away with a game vs. the team everyone expected to come in second in the Central Division. The final score (103-97) doesn’t illustrate how throat-stomping the Pacers run was. They missed a bunch of free throws in desperation-foul time while Milwaukee hit a bunch of three-point heaves. But they were up by 14 with less than two minutes to play and the game was already a wrap.

Danny Granger lead the charge with 9 points during the Pacers’ go-ahead 16-2 run, including two long, dagger treys that began the back-breaking process. (He scored 30 on 15 shots for the game.) When Granger pulls up and lets it fly with the type of confidence he had at that point in the game, it’s like he is a different player. His stance is more balanced. His motion is more fluid. Everything is in rhythm. And his demeanor is red-lining on arrogance — in a good way.

After making his second three during the run — a shot that poetically followed nice makes by the team’s other two most important players, Roy Hibbert and Darren Collison — Granger was beating his chest while jumping around and nodding his head like he was auditioning for a remake of the Woo Hah video.

The only other thing I feel the need to express here is how impressed I am with Paul George. Since he played the final 16 minutes of the game, it would seem that Coach Frank Vogel feels the same way.

George only shot 2-for-4 during this extended stretch, but it wasn’t his ability to make shots that was encouraging. It was the little stuff. It was the stuff that helped show us how much of a complete player he can be.

He tied a career high with 8 free-throw attempts. He only made 4 of them, but who cares. I’m not concerned about his ability to make 15-footers with no one guarding him. But getting to the line is one of the best — and under-discussed — skills to have in this league. Even in limited minutes, George has gotten to the line 8 times in twice in his last 8 games. (He has also had both a 6-FTA game and a 5-FTA game during that stretch.)

The kid also grabbed 5 rebounds in the fourth quarter alone (to give him 7 for the game in 24 minutes). Better still, at least twice after he secured the board, he didn’t just hold it and look for Darren Collison. He freed himself from the traffic and dribbled up the court to get the offense started. This is a small thing, but you can see his growing confidence with the ball. Very few non-PG Pacers players have been all that comfortable bringing up the ball over the past few seasons. Even Granger is awkward about it. Mike Dunleavy, Jr. is really the only guy that did it very often in any way that made you think the offense was going to be initiated properly rather than just making you think the shot clock was going to dwindle down to 14 before a point guard came and got the ball and had to force something immediately.

The two-guard spot has been a weak point for this team since Dunleavy had his career-year in 2007-08. And even then, the back court was weak defensively, lacking anyone who could hope to so much as bother the Dwyane Wades, Kobe Bryants and Manu Ginobilis of the world.

Now, it looks like the Pacers have a guy who can be a high-level two-way player.

By scoring double-digit points in 8 of his past 12 games, Paul George has showed us that he can score. By buckling down and digging in on defense, he has shown us that he has the chops to guard people.

And increasingly, by rebounding, getting to the line and looking like a confident, capable ball-handler, he is showing us that there may be very little on a basketball court he can’t do.

{ 4 comments }

You have to feel bad for Roy Hibbert after last night’s loss to Milwaukee. With the score tied and Indiana seemingly in control on the game’s final possession, the Pacers ran a play in which he set a screen to free Danny Granger, who was then entrusted to either hit the game-winning shot or pass off to someone who could.

Danny did his job, dribbling his way into the paint, drawing a double team and then finding an open Hibbert on the elbow with about three ticks remaining. It looked as if we were about to see a near-replay of Rik Smits’ famous game-winner against the Orlando Magic in Game 4 of the 1995 Playoffs. Instead, we saw a near air-ball from Roy, who probably could have taken just a split second longer to gather himself before putting up the shot.

Given that he took the shot with such little time left, it should have been no big deal. The score was tied, remember, so a miss would just mean that the clock would expire as the ball ricocheted off the rim, and the teams would duke it out for five more minutes in overtime.

But the ball didn’t bounce. It grazed the rim and landed out of bounds, giving the Bucks 0.5 seconds to set up an amazing last-second play. All Roy did was miss a shot — plenty of people have done that. He just happened to miss it in the most unfortunate way possible, something that likely helped prompt a post-game tweet from the big fella saying “That is the tuffest loss of the my NBA career.”

It’s only December, so don’t worry, Roy. Just go get a W. No one’s going to be too mad at you.

Still, Roy’s inability to even come close to hitting the shot did remind Pacers Digest poster smj887 of this classic Jeff Foster game-losing shot. Jeff’s was worse since the Pacers were trailing, not tied (and it was just worse cause it was worse), but both will ultimately — in time — just be funny.

So in memory of the “Where Amazing Happens” treatment someone gave Jeff, here is a similar video for Roy.

{ 0 comments }

By now, you probably saw the amazing, last-second play in which a miraculous pass from Luc Mbah a Moute was tipped in by Andrew Bogut to beat the Pacers. There was only 0.5 seconds left and the score was tied. Indiana likely thought they would play a half-second of defense and then head to overtime, but Bogut had other ideas.

Here it is.

There’s really not a whole lot else to say. Roy Hibbert badly airballed an open shot from the elbow on the previous play that would have put the Pacers ahead by two. Danny Granger hit a huge jumper shortly before that.

Otherwise? It was a sloppy game in which Indiana gave up an insane number of offensive boards, allowing a Bucks team that was shooting horrendously to not only stay in the game but lead by double-digits in the first half.

The Pacers played better after the break, gaining and then relinquishing the lead on several occasions. In the final minute, it really looked like this might be another game in which the team could play ugly and still win — on the road (much like last week’s victory over the Kings).

But, again, Bogut had other ideas.

You can pick apart the Pacers poor play here — and we very well might tomorrow — but for tonight, I’m just going to tip my cap to the Australian, Brandon Jennings (who set the pick on Jeff Foster) and, mostly, Mbah a Moute for executing a play perfectly.

You can also read more on the game from The Indy Star, IndyCornrows, Bucksketball and BrewHoop.

{ 7 comments }

Game #20 Preview: Buck Hunting

by Jared Wade on December 8, 2010 at 2:49 pm · 0 comments

Indiana Pacers @ Milwaukee Bucks
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
8:00 pm EST
Bradley Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

The 2010-11 Pacers look like the 2009-10 Bucks. Last year, Milwaukee was the darling team that everyone dug, mostly due to its quick, electric young point guard and its fundamentally sound, rapidly evolving center. Well, Brandon Jennings may have had more to do with the Bucks’ rise last year than Darren Collison has for this season’s Pacers, but the speedy floor general along with the still-improving Roy Hibbert have been the biggest factors.

And now, as Milwaukee tailspins amid preseason expectations, the Pacers have taken their moniker as Central Division surprise artists. Interestingly, they are also doing it the same way: with defense. The Bucks were the leagues 2nd best defensive squad last season, only allowing 103.1 points per 100 possessions and only allowing opponents to shoot an eFG% of 48.6% (good for 8th best in the NBA). This year’s Pacers are the 7th best defensive team in the NBA, allowing an even-better 102.8 points per 100 possessions while surrendering an eFG% of 46.8% (good for 3rd best).

This year’s Bucks team is similarly tough in terms of allowing buckets — they are 5th best with 101.8 points per 100. But the reason they are struggling so mightily to win games is that their offense has fallen off a cliff. In terms of both points per possession and eFG%, they are the worst offense in the NBA.

A lot of this can probably be attributed to the struggles of John Salmons. The great Bucks blog Brew Hoop had a good post detailing exactly why Salmons might be playing so much worse than he did for Milwaukee last season. For Pacers fans hoping their team wins tonight, this is the key takeaway.

What does seem clear is Salmons’ importance to the Bucks’ bottom line. The former Miami star has averaged 17.0 ppg, 3.7 apg, and 3.9 rpg on .467/.435/.758 shooting in seven Bucks wins, but just 10.2 ppg, 2.7 apg, and 3.3 rpg on some seriously terrible .318/.306/.771 shooting in 12 losses.

If Indiana can keep Salmons in check tonight in Milwaukee, that would seem to be the first step to beating the Bucks, something the Pacers couldn’t even do on their own court on November 5 — despite the fact that their best player, Andrew Bogut, didn’t even dress that night. In fact, beating the Bucks isn’t something the Pacers have done much of at all even dating back to last season. They were swept in their four meetings last season and are only 3-7 in their last 10 match-ups.

Of course, the November loss came before we knew that this year’s Indy team might be good and before we knew that this year’s Bucks team might be bad. Now, both teams are gleefully or painfully (respectively) aware of their current situations.

Whether this can reverse the recent fortune for Indiana vs. Milwaukee is unknown.

But we will find out in a few hours.

Pacers vs Bucks By the Numbers

Bucks vs Pacers
7-13 (10th) Record (Conf Rank) 10-9 (7th)
5-5 (Home) Home / Road Records 5-4 (Road)
Lost 1 Current Streak Won 1
5-0 Last 5 Head-to-Head 0-5
-2.00 (20th) Point Differential (Rank) +3.00 (9th)
99.6 (30th) Offensive Rating (Rank) 106.0 (18th)
44.1% (30th) eFG% (Rank) 50.8% (10th)
101.8 (5th) Defensive Rating (Rank) 102.8 (7th)
48.7% (11th) Opponent's eFG% (Rank) 46.8% (3rd)
90.8 (23rd) Pace (Rank) 94.6 (8th)

{ 0 comments }