Posts tagged as:

Orlando Magic

Game #81 Recap: A (Not So) Subtle Reminder

by Tim Donahue on April 13, 2010 at 11:00 pm

Orlando Magic 118 – Indiana Pacers 98

————–

It seems to me that the low point of this season occurred during the four-game West Coast swing at the beginning of March.  The road trip started with twin 23-point losses to the Lakers and the Blazers, then finished up with a pair of eight-point losses to the Nuggs and Suns.  While the Suns game was hotly contested (though a little overly fake-tough-guy-macho, in my opinion),  the final score on the Nuggets game was only that close because of a 10-0 Pacer run late in the fourth, long after the Nuggets stopped giving a tinker’s damn (whatever the hell that is).

I’m sure that, if asked to pick a specific moment when this season reached rock bottom, most would agree that it came in the post-game interview after the loss to the Lakers.  When asked to comment on Josh McRoberts’ performance (then a career high), Pacer Coach Jim O’Brien uttered his now infamous “irrelevant” response.  To some, this was the straw that broke the camel’s back with O’Brien, causing a huge outflow of animosity and leaving Pacers Nation with a continuing flow of snarky “irrelevant” jokes of the same quantity (and same general quality) of “you are the weakest link” and “you are voted off the island” quips of years past.

It was, in fact, a stupid thing for O’Brien to say.  It was pointless, and more than a little petty.  Of course, it was also 100% accurate, but I don’t think that makes it any less of a dick move.

So, the Pacers trudged home from that trip a whopping 23 games below .500, the furthest under water (in terms of games) the franchise had been since February of 1989.  They came home in what looked like total disarray, with a team pulling in 14 different directions.  It seemed almost without question that the coach had lost the team, and, quite possibly, the players had lost themselves.

Then, for reasons I don’t fully understand, they found themselves.  Coming into last night’s game, the Pacers had won 12 of the 17 games since that trip, including 10 of the last 12.  Granted, it was no murderer’s row.  Eleven of the 17 games (and 10 of the 12 wins) came at home.  One of the road wins came at Detroit, who is 99 different kinds of crap.  The other came at Cleveland, a team that was resting so many players that they started a video tech guy, and the first player off the bench was actually one cheerleader on another cheerleader’s shoulders wearing a Cavs uniform and a trench coat.

Still, there was clearly progress made.  There were impressive (almost dominating) wins against Oklahoma City and Utah, both of which are currently regretting their losses in an insanely tight Western Conference race.  There was a good solid win against Charlotte, also involved in playoff race.  The once-incompetent offense, averaging 101.9 per 100 prior to this stretch, was now clocking along at 112.3 per 100.

There were some very good things to be seen from some of the players.

Consider the following:

  • Danny Granger playing like the guy we expected coming into the season.  After averaging 23.1 points on a very disappointing .491 eFG% through March 6th, Danny averaged 28.3 points on .539 eFG% over his next 15 outings.
  • Troy Murphy had respectable numbers coming into this stretch, with 13.8 points and 9.8 rebounds on .542 eFG%, but his core numbers were stratospheric over this stretch.  His scoring jumped to 18.1 points on a gaudy .598 eFG%, while his rebounding numbers grew to 12.1 per night.  More importantly, the team performed better with him on the floor.  Over the first 63 games of the season, Troy’s regular +/- was -10.4 per 48 minutes, by far the worst of the core players.  The team was a net 12.2 points per 100 possessions worse with him on the floor than when he was off the floor.  During this stretch, his regular +/- of +8.9 was the best of the core players, and the team was a net 9.4 points per 100 better with him on the floor.
  • Earl Watson finally took control of the point guard position and stabilized it.  His assists jumped from 4.5 per night to 7.1, and the team scored 114 points per 100 possessions with him on the floor.
  • A.J. Price and Josh McRoberts finally got some consistent minutes and both performed admirably.  Price averaged almost 18 minutes a night after T. J. Ford went down with a groin injury, while McRoberts logged 15 minutes per in his role as first big off the bench.  Price was more consistent, as his role was more defined.  He showed some good things, but also showed that he has some trouble with quicker guards.  Early in the stretch, it looked like McBob might alternate with Solomon Jones as that first big off the bench, but he pretty much got control of the minutes after a few games.  On a team pretty much devoid of athleticism, Josh’s hops and occasionally spectacular plays provided some of the more memorable moments of a forgettable season.

Then There Was Last Night

Last night was pretty much a flashback to the bad (and not-so) old days.  Other than a roughly five-minute stretch in the second quarter when the Pacers used a 16-2 run to cut the lead to nine, the Magic thoroughly dominated.  I don’t think anybody who watched the game would disagree that Orlando won virtually every aspect of the game.  They outshot the Pacers 48% to 41% and outrebounded them 53-37.  They took 19 more free throws than Indiana, and hit 16  more.

The Magic took their first double-digit lead at the 6:22 mark of the 1st Quarter.  Over the remaining 42:22 of game time, the lead only dipped below 10 points for 16 seconds.  The Magic held a lead of 20 points or more for 26:31 of clock time, or about 55% of the game.  Alas, this one had no alibi, it was U-G-L-Y.

Here’s the deal:  I said the Pacers found themselves. I didn’t say they found the ‘96 Bulls.

Last night’s game was a reminder of what this team is, at least in terms of its limitations.

What last night reminds us of was how thin the margin of error is for this team.  It reminds us that, if Danny can’t get it going, and if Roy can’t get it going, then it’s all over but the shouting.  It reminds us that the “puncher’s chance” shooting the three gives this team can leave them flat on the canvas if all they get are swings and misses.

So do we wad up the previous 17 games and throw them in the trash?  Nope. We don’t. That all happened. It may not have been great for the franchise in terms of draft position. In fact, it almost certainly wasn’t.

But it had to have been good for these players individually — and collectively — on some level. It gave them some idea that they are (OK, at least some of them are) legitimate NBA players. And while last night’s game was an obvious reminder that they aren’t great NBA players, hey, at least it wasn’t the last game of the season.

They will have one more opportunity to wash that terrible taste out of their mouths and go into the Summer with some semblance of confidence that this team, while by no means good, may not be as bad as they were for the first four months of the season.

That doesn’t say a lot, no … But it does say something.

Bring on the Wizards.

{ 6 comments }

Indiana Pacers 98, Orlando Magic 109

————

The only positive thing I can say about the way the Pacers are playing lately is that they are really helping me brush up on my math skills. They have trailed by at least 23 points in four of their last six games, and I have spent the bulk of that time trying to calculate things like 52 minus 28 or the difference between 33 and 17. And for this, I must thank you, Pacers. Because aside from the division it takes to split dinner checks six ways or the occasional time zone change, my mathematical abilities are seldom-used and decaying by the day.

Some people might say, “But Jared, what about the comeback in the 4th? They cut the deficit to 8 at one point after a Troy trey and a nice pull-up jumper by Granger.” Well, Mrs. Theoretical Question Poser With a Detailed Memory of the 4th Quarter Play-By-Play, that was what we at 8p9s like to call a “faux comeback.”

You see, it is very hard for an NBA team that is up by 15 or more points to really keep playing optimally. Players relax a little, take some off-balance shots, throw a few cutesy passes around and just generally lose that “edge” that makes them go for the jugular. And normally, it doesn’t matter. They still win. It’s human nature to ease up a little, and although I’m sure all coaches reprimand their players for it, it’s infrequent that it ever leads to a to a monumental collapse. Things like what the Pacers did last week — coming back from 23 down — are very rare. That’s why it’s so incredibly odd that it happened twice in a row.

But it doesn’t mean they have some uncanny ability to comeback. It’s just an meaningless oddity for Elias Sports to track. Something really irregular happened. And then it happened again. Weird. But not particularly relevant to the rest of the season. The odds are overwhelmingly against it ever occurring again, and if you ask anyone in the Suns or Raptors organization “What happened, dude?” they would undoubtedly say “We totally blew it” and not “Man, those Pacers just don’t quit.”

The Pacers made some shots in the second half and between that and a long offensive drought for Orlando in to start the fourth quarter allowed Indiana to make this thing look respectable. But it really wasn’t.

The fact is that the Pacers have to play very, very well to beat a team as talented as Orlando. And by picking up three fouls in less than three minutes, Danny Granger pretty much assured that that was not going to happen. You could argue that Jim O’Brien should have taken him out after he picked up foul number two (on a charge) just 1:06 into the game. But Danny needs to understand that this team needs him on the floor and not pick up that third one. Still, foul number three again came on offense while he was being aggressive — and I’ve been pleading with him to be more aggressive offensively off the bounce all year — so I really can’t be too, too upset at that. Had it been a reach-in foul or an over-the-back, I would be less understanding.

After he went to bench, the Magic scored 9 points on their next four possessions (3 threes with a Dwight Howard offensive foul in between) to start an 18-10 run and take a 26-12 lead overall. So O’Brien figured, as Orlando color commentator Matt Guokas said, “why not?” and put Danny back in with a few minutes left in the first quarter.

It didn’t really help.

The Magic ended the first up 40-20 and the game felt all but over. “Can the Pacers petition the league for running time” is how my 8p9s co-conspirator Tim Donahue put it soon after. It’s hard to pinpoint exactly what went wrong — other than everything — and I’m not going to waste your time listing all the bad possessions Indy wasted and the defensive assignments they blew. But the worst of the worst came from Mike Dunleavy. Twice during the quarter, he was the man responsible for stopping the 6′1″, 34-year-old Jason Williams from scoring on the break. And both times, he gave such a lacksadaisical, pseudo attempt at defense that I was personally embarrassed for him. No one is ever going to confuse Lil’ Dun for Ron Artest, but JWill was able to not only freeze him but make him nearly flinch away like an abused dog just with a simple head-and-shoulder fake to such a degree that the layup was uncontested at the cup both times. Truly awful stuff from Mike.

But it wasn’t just Junior, obviously. In their win over Orlando just two weeks ago, Indiana allowed 24 free-throw attempts and 38.4% shooting while committing 11 turnovers in the whole game. In just one quarter tonight, they allowed 11 free-throw attempts and 60.9% shooting while coughing up the rock 7 times.

And, oh yeah, those 40 points.

The second quarter wasn’t as bad statistically, but there wasn’t much qualitative improvement inside my TV set. Nonexistent defense once again allowed a 9-points-in-four-possession stretch after two threes and a silly Dahntay Jones foul during a Ryan Anderson three point attempt. After the accurate big man made all three freebies, the Magic were up 59-30 and this one was academic.

According to Mike Wells of the Indianapolis Star, Coach ripped the team a new one at the half. Danny, for his part, at least realized he deserved it.

“He got into (us),” Granger said. “We’re not always tied together as a team. We make selfish plays on offense and defense. We argue with each other instead of getting mad at the other team. We deserve everything he told us. We can’t get down 25 points every game we play.”

You can head over there or perhaps Cornrows (haven’t actually read Tom’s piece yet) for more on the “comeback.”

Me? I’m not gonna waste your time pretending that was based on reality. That was just Orlando taking their foot off Indy’s throat for a few minutes until they realized the dog wasn’t completely dead.

But it was.

There might have been a little movement left, but it was just their residual tension in their muscles twitching around before the clocked ticked all the way to zero in what was their 17th double-digit loss of the season. For perspective, they only had 14 last year. And that was in 82 games, not 42.

Five Other Things

(1) Hibbert was virtually worthless this time against Dwight after having perhaps the best game of his career against Superman last time out. 3 points and 3 boards in 18 minutes. Thanks for coming out.

(2) Matt Guokas is perhaps my favorite announcer in the league not named Clyde Frazier. He had an extended exchange with play-by-play guy David Steele about whether or not Dwight should continue to shoot the 15- to 18-footers that he was banking in against the Lakers on Monday. Steele said that he ought to as long as he can make 50% of them, just to keep the defense honest. But since he shoots such a high percentage around the rim, shooting anything less than 50% from the mid-range wouldn’t make the benefits worth it. Guokas then explained to him that almost no one in the entire NBA shoots 50% from the mid-range (NBA average from 10-23 feet is about 40%), and that Dwight’s 70% rate of finishing around the rim, while impressive, is not other-worldly. Indeed, some 100 NBA players shoot well above 65% at the hoop and his 45.9% shooting on those shots that aren’t layups but are within 10 feet is actually pretty low. (Derrick Rose, for example, shoots 61% on these attempts, while KG shoots 59% and even Chris Kaman is around 55%.) I’m expounding a little here on Guokas’ exact thoughts by getting so specific, but hearing a color commentator discuss the nuances of shot location efficiency on TV is the type of thing that gets me all sorts of dork excited. It provides such hope for the future of advanced stat stuff and at the same time exposes the ignorance maintained by many of those tasked with explaining the game to the mass public. No offense to Steele, who I usually like, but Guokas showed how much better and well-prepared he was to talk about basketball in public in under a minute. It was the highlight of the game for me. Not sure who that’s sadder for: me or the Pacers.

(3) Granger finished with a decent stat line and looked better in the second half. 25 points on 9/19 with 6 boards isn’t bad. Shooting 2/7 from behind the arc sure is though. Same ol’, same ol’.

(4) Matt Barnes got hyped early in this one, in part by drawing two offensive fouls from Danny Granger in the opening three minutes. This all culminated in him collecting a career-high 16 boards. Not sure where, but I distinctly recall someone saying Indy shouldn’t let him be a sparkplug in the opening quarter. Similarly, Vince Carter had a sweet alley-oop dunk in the first quarter. That, too, was something that the sage wisdom I read earlier recommended the Pacers avoid. AND IF I RECALL CORRECTLY, HE WROTE IT IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS FOR EMPHASIS SINCE THAT’S HOW BLOGGERS MAKE POINTS DRAMATICALLY. I don’t remember who wrote that though. (Spoiler alert: it was me today in “Other Things” #3 and #5. And the point here isn’t that I’m particularly smart — that’s provably false. The point is that this stuff is rather obvious. You don’t let Matt Barnes be a factor when your main concern has to be slowing down Dwight, Rashard and Vince.)

(5) I got nothing else. This game sucked.

The Saddest Place on Earth: By The Numbers

Pacers @ Magic
98 Score 109
0 Largest Lead 29
97.0 Offensive Efficiency 107.9
48.7% eFG% 56.0%
44.8% (34/76) FG% 49.4% (37/75)
25.0% (6/24) 3PT% 38.5% (10/26)
72.8% (24/33) FT% 67.6% (25/37)
35 (7) Rebounds (Off.) 50 (12)
19 (28) Turnovers (Points Led To) 21 (21)
34 Points in the Paint 42
9 Fast Break Points 32
13 Assists 25

Post-Game Essentials: Box Score | PM Game Flow | Play-By-Play | Shot Chart | Behind the Box Score | Indy Star Recap | Cornrows Recap | AP Recap | Pacer’s Digest Post Game

{ 3 comments }

Indiana Pacers @ Orlando Magic
Wednesday, January 20
7:00 PM EST
The O-Rena
Orlando, Florida

————-

Although the Pacers beat the Magic 97-90 in a rather quick-paced game (98 possessions) two weeks ago in Indianapolis, neither team took a lot of threes — at least not by their standards. The Pacers average 22.0 3PAs per game (6th highest in the NBA) but only took 16 (and only made a pedestrian 5). Orlando averages a league-high 28.5 3PAs per game, but “only” took 22 (and made 9, which while a ton, is just under how many they expect to make each night).

You would think that when two “live by the three, die by the three” squads meet up, we would see a total shootout. But that wasn’t the case here. And seeing that Orlando definitely “lived by the three” by both being more accurate from distance and scoring a higher percentage (30%) of their points on threes, you would think that the Magic would have won.

So how did the Pacers win with such relative ease over one of the four or five teams that most experts think can actually win the title this year?

They played good defense (Orlando shot 38.4%), didn’t foul as much as usual (24 FTAs vs. the 30 they normally allow) and didn’t turn the ball over (only 11 turnovers vs. the 14.8 they average).

Of course, there was also a great game from Roy Hibbert — quite likely the best game of his career in fact. He was fantastic on the block and clearly had Dwight Howard flustered. Just by his mass alone, Roy is one of the few people in the league that Superman can’t treat as a rag-doll, and that, combined with his fantastic post moves, hook shots and jumpers that evening (he was 3/4 from outside 16 feet) put Howard out of sorts.

But while that interior clash of the titans will be the best sub-story here, the real story that determines the outcome tonight will be the same as it was last time: Stopping Rashard Lewis, Vince Carter and company from taking and making easy shots. Expecting the Pacers to do as well as they did in that category as they did in Indy is beyond unlikely (Lewis was 2/8 and Vince shot 2/15), but if they can do something similar in that regard and play better offense than they did last time (Indy only shot 42.9% themselves in the win) then they might just have a shot at beating a scuffling Magic team again.

Five Other Things

(1) Orlando is playing terrible basketball of late. They’ve lost their last 3 and 7 of their last 10 — which includes embarrassing losses to Washington, Chicago,  and, if we’re being honest, Indiana.

(2) Dwight Howard hasn’t been particularly active on offense all year. His PPG and FGAs per game are both at four-year lows for him, and it seems like the departure of Hedo has left few guys on the perimeter who are adept at getting him the ball. Even when he does flash aggressively in the post, he often doesn’t get the ball. Thus, he seems less than eager to waste all the energy that it takes to fight for deep position on the block. Can’t really blame him. Why bother if no one is gonna get you the ball? That’s what I’ve seen anyway. Against the Lakers on Monday, however, he was as active as I’ve seen him all year. He owned the paint offensively for large stretches of that game, and if it wasn’t for unbelievable bad shooting by the rest of the team in the 4th quarter, we would all be talking about how spectacular and active Dwight was in a win against the “unbeatable” Lakers. Pacers fans don’t really care about any of that, but the point here is that if that Dwight happens to show up like that again on offense, Indy is in big, big trouble.

(3) The Vince Carter in Orlando Experiment has been an overwhelming failure thus far. He’s shooting 38.6% overall and 30.6% from the floor. And in his last 8 games, he is an absolutely abysmal 15/67 shooting (22.4%). The Pacers should let him shoot early and often from the outside and NOT LET HIM GET ANYTHING EASY EARLY TO GET HIM BACK ON TRACK. I cannot say that strongly enough. If Brandon Rush or Granger or Dahntay or whoever lets him get into the paint in the first few minutes or lets him get a dunk in transition then the game plan for this evening needs to be serious questioned.

(4) Ryan Anderson has been one of the better under-the-radar role players for a contender this year. He can change any game with his three-point shooting.

(5) Matt Barnes is one of the few “go hard” guys on this team and the Pacers really don’t need to let him get any big dunks, steals or dive-on-the-ground plays early. Guys like Vince and Rashard — and even Dwight sometimes — are passive by nature, but can be energized when they see someone like Barnes get all hyped. Basically, don’t poke the bear with a stick.

Pacers in Orlando: Tale of the Tape

Pacers @ Magic
14-27 (13th) Overall Record (Conf Rank) 26-15 (4th)
4-17 (Road) Home / Road Records 14-4 (Home)
5-5 Record Last 10 Games 3-7
Lost 2 Current Streak Lost 3
2-3 Last 5 Head-to-Head 3-2
-5.37 (28th) Avg Scoring Margin +4.51 (7th)
98.9 (18th) Points Per Game 101.0 (10th)
101.3 (27th) Offensive Rating 108.8 (9th)
43.3% (28th) FG% 45.6% (18th)
47.5% (25th) eFG% 52.2% (5th)
104.3 (25th) Opponent's PPG 96.5 (8th)
106.8 (16th) Defensive Rating 103.9 (6th)
45.3% (12th) Opponent's FG% 44.1% (4th)
48.9% (10th) Opponent's eFG% 48.1% (6th)
97.7 (2nd) Pace 92.9 (14th)

{ 1 comment }