Posts tagged as:

Wilson Chandler

The Pacers lost a tough one 98-92 to the Knicks this afternoon. Neither team was ever in control until the Knicks put it away late when Amar’e Stoudemire turning it on coincided with the whole Pacers offense turning it off. While Amar’e scored 6 of his team’s final 7 points (on his way to 26 overall), the entire Indiana squad could only manage to score 2 points in the final 3:47 of the game.

That final Pacers’ bucket came on jumper by Darren Collison, who maintained the offensive assertiveness he showed all game (but just couldn’t convert in the clutch otherwise. For Indiana, it was an unfortunate, yet somewhat poetic, ending to the game.

Their best quarter was the first and this was largely due to them being aggressive. Collison set the tone. The game’s first two points were the result of Darren pushing the ball hard up court and taking it to the rim. The next trip down was similar. Collison rushed up court and got into the paint. He couldn’t create a good look for himself, but he kicked it out, creating a very good three-point attempt for Mike Dunleavy, Jr. That shot didn’t go down, but the Pacers retained possession and Granger hit a three. Collison would also hit a three himself shortly thereafter, giving the team a 10-7 lead along while showing the Knicks that they were ready to force the action despite the one o’clock tip-off.

By the time it was over, Darren had a season-high 17 field goal attempts to go along with 22 points (plus 6 assist, 5 boards and 2 steals), marking only the second time he has eclipsed the 20-point mark this year. (The last came on November 9). Too bad that it was his final few misses that kept the Pacers from putting any points on the board late.

This isn’t a bad thing; his intentions were good and there wasn’t anyone else doing anything effectively. The Pacers only put up 15 points in the fourth quarter on 7-for-23 shooting (30.4%). Someone had to do something. Darren took charge and managed to drive into the paint twice. This would have likely worked out better if Ronny Turiaf had not been there to meet him both times.

Still, I have routinely criticized Danny Granger and others for settling for a jumper after a big guy switched out on them on the perimeter. So I have to give Collison credit for going at Turiaf when he was trying to cover DC at the top of the key. Darren couldn’t create enough space to get a good shot off though. And the next time he did get to the hoop, Turiaf smacked it out the sky. Happens.

Between Turiaf’s hustle and Amar’e's big buckets, MSG was going nuts. As some of you know, I live in New York so I was there and can confirm that, starting with Stoudemire’s back-to-back blocks around the six-minutes-to-go mark, the World’s Most Famous Arena was rocking. No one is ever going to confuse Amar’e with a great defender, but the way he contested Brandon Rush at the hoop was impressive. Even more impressive? The fact that he inadvertently saved the ball to Danny Granger then recovered from falling out of bounds in time to block the bejesus out of Danny’s dunk attempt. The roof was blown off.

A Wilson Chandler three-pointer would re-ignite the crowd a few minutes later and then back-to-back Amare’ buckets starting at the 2:43 mark would make them lose their minds again. It was pretty clear that this game was a wrap. Nice day to be in the Garden — for Knicks fans.

Getting back to Rush, I thought he played rather well — at least in the first half — despite him finishing with an ugly 6-for-17 shooting afternoon. He missed some open looks, and that’s never good, but it is a forgivable offense. (This should not be confused with the team’s overall unforgivable offense.) More important than missing or making jumpshots (he was 0-for-5 on threes), however, is that Brandon was aggressive with the ball.

At one point early in the second quarter, he hit a jumper that he helped create and he followed that up with a drive-and-dish to Solomon Jones for an open shot on the next possession. Then the next trip down, he drove again, forcing the defense to collapse in the paint. He tried to find Solo again on the baseline. It wasn’t the best pass, and it ended up out of bounds, but that looked to be more due to the bad hands Solo.

About a minute and a half later, he finished a slick, driving reverse layup. And on the next trip, he dribbled hard at Chandler, breaking his ankles to the point that he fell down. Unfortunately, he passed off before he realized Wilson was collapsing, but after quickly fading behind the arc, he demanded the ball and got the pass in time to pop off a good shot. He missed. But both the aggressive drive attempt and him calling for the ball back for the shot are good things. An assertive Brandon is a better Brandon.

Maybe I’m over-rating one six-minute stretch, but these are the things that Brandon has to do more often if he wants to become a more complete player in this league. So positives like this are a good sign. I mean … watch … Next game he probably won’t dribble the ball one time though.

That’s how this works with Rush.

Danny obviously did some really good things this afternoon. He scored 19 first-half points on 7-for-15 shooting. He also grabbed 10 boards in the half and finished with what-has-to-be-a-career-high 17 (looking for confirmation). Six of his first-half boards were offensive and he wasn’t alone; Indy grabbed 9 in the first quarter, 15 in the first half and 21 overall. This led to a 99-73 field goal attempt advantage for the Pacers, but their 37.4% shooting and their 19-40 free-throw attempt deficit counteracted the benefits of all the extra shots.

Getting back to Danny, his first-half success didn’t translate to after the break, as illustrated by his 2-for-8 shooting in the final two quarters. This, combined with the curious decision by Jim O’Brien to only give Roy Hibbert about 5 minutes after half time (we’ll get to this in another post) led to an offense that Danny generously, even by his own admission, characterized as “sputtering.”

The locker room after the game reflected the disappointment of another poor offensive outing and another squandered opportunity to get a badly needed win on the road. “It’s frustrating right now,” said Collison. “We can’t get used to losing.”

I asked Granger whether he is concerned that such frustration, particularly given how many young guys are in the rotation, will continue to build and keep the team from regaining its early season success. He seemed worried to a degree, but said that it was his job to make sure everyone stays positive and that the young guys don’t let the losses weigh on their mind. “You have to have a short memory,” said Granger.

That’s all well and good, but I fear it will be increasingly difficult for a 14-18 team that has to play San Antonio, Atlanta, Dallas and Chicago in four of its next five games. It those games go how I expect them to, Danny might need one of those Men in Black mind-erasers by the time mid-January rolls around.

{ 5 comments }

Game #4 Preview: Need Win, Will Travel

by Jared Wade on November 4, 2009 at 5:20 pm · 1 comment

Indiana Pacers @ New York Knicks
Madison Square Garden
New York, New York
7:30 PM EST

Pacers vs. Wizards
1-3 Record 2-3
98.7 (26th) Offensive Rating 108.8 (10th)
106.4 (14th) Defensive Rating 108.1 (19th)
0.471 (19th) eFG% 0.494 (15th)
0.483 (13th) Opponent's eFG% 0.476 (11th)
97.8 (3rd) Pace 90.6 (24th)

Glossary: Offensive Rating | Defensive Rating | eFG% | Pace

The Pacers need a win. Badly.

There has never been a must-win game in the history of November basketball, so let’s not get carried away, but leaguewide, Indiana is joined by only New Jersey and Golden State in the winless category. More importantly, the team has looked inept on both ends of the floor.

Defensively, few people outside of the confines of Conseco Fieldhouse realistically thought the team was going to be anything better than below-average. Even offensively, it’s not like the team was a juggernaut of efficiency or anything last season — they just took a lot of shots and, thus, made a lot of shots.

But regardless of the 2008-09 team’s middling offensive talent, they certainly put points on the board. Indy’s 105.1 ppg was good for 5th best in the league (albeit at only 108.1 points per 100 possessions, which was 18th best in the NBA). Through three games this season, however, they have dropped that average down to 95.0 ppg (21st in the NBA) and an utterly embarrassing 97.9 points per 100 possessions.

A lot of this is sample size, obviously.

We’re still only talking about three games (against three 2008-09 playoff teams nonetheless) and much of the meager scoring output can be attributed to just plain old bad shooting. Let’s not let Danny Granger off the hook completely here because a true upper echelon basketball player would put the ball on the deck and get to the hoop/foul line when he is struggling, but Danny has missed a ton of threes that he normally makes. At 3/13 and 2/10 from behind the arc the last two games, sure, he’s taking to many threes. But three-point shooting is his primary weapon out there.

Fortunately, the Knicks have been fairly bad themselves so far in the early goings. Aside from Danilo Gallinari (who leads the NBA in three-point makes and takes) shooting an eye-popping 45.2% from three and David Lee doing all the David Lee stuff he does while posting a Shaq-in-his-primesque 62.8% from the field, there’s not a ton for Coach D’Antoni to get excited about.

Still, I haven’t personally seen much of the Knicks yet this year aside from the opening night blow-out they received from the Heat. So for a little more perspective on what the Pacers can expect this evening, I reached out to Mike Kurylo of KnickerBlogger fame. He’s one of the better stat-oriented guys when it comes to discussing the league at large and knows Indy’s New York rivals as well as anyone.

Here’s what he has to say. Per usual, I brought the Qs, Mike dropped the As.

knickerblogger

The Knicks  are 1-3 after getting blown out by Miami and Philly, dropping a close one to Charlotte and, most recently, beating up on Chris Paul and the Hornets. How has the team looked overall and what prompted that 40-point fourth quarter outburst that help you take down New Orleans?

Overall the Knicks have looked poor. In each of the first three games they’ve had 20+ point deficits. One of the changes against New Orleans was to insert Gallinari into the lineup. His hot three-point shooting opened the inside up for David Lee and Chris Duhon to run the pick & roll. In the first three games, teams were able to collapse in the middle, which made the team more one dimensional. I documented this on my blog today, showing how opponents are giving the Knicks the outside shot (namely Wilson Chandler) in lieu of letting them score in the paint.

Much like last year, Coach D’Antoni has his boys chucking threes and putting up points. Why the terrible 28.8% on threes? Is it just missing open looks like the Pacers 27.0%? Or something else? The personnel is just about the same, and Danilo Gallinari, who is leading the NBA in attempts, has hit 45% of his shots from behind the arc?

The team has had some open looks, but haven’t been able to get them to fall. Another problem is a lack of a true shooting guard. Wilson Chandler is not a strong outside shooter. Meanwhile, Larry Hughes and Nate Robinson are more effective as slashers. New York runs an offense that relies on shooting as one main component, and they lack a shooting guard.

What’s up with Nate Robinson? His numbers are gross?

Nate really hasn’t seen a lot of minutes — he’s just a tad above Jared Jeffries in minutes per game. I think he’ll be his normal productive self once he gets back from injury and once he sees some real court time.

How are the rest of the guys looking? Our old friend Al Harrington had 42 the other night but has been pretty bad otherwise. Wilson Chandler is shooting badly as well. Other than David Lee and Danilo is there anyone else who has been playing well that Pacer fans should be worried about tonight?

Al Harrington scores, but doesn’t contribute much else. Danilo Gallinari looks pretty good. Not only is he lighting it up from outside, but he’s shown good court vision and some ability to take his guy off the dribble — although I expect him to be inconsistent at this young age. David is great at scoring in the paint and grabbing rebounds but has been pretty bad defensively. Darko has shown good passing in the half court set, but his defense at the 5 is less than advertised, and he hasn’t gotten a lot of burn. Larry Hughes is playing out of his mind, but you know that has to stop. And be prepared for the Jared Jeffries three-point onslaught!

Looking at the defensive stats, the Knicks are currently 28th in defensive efficiency while the Pacers are 26th. Any predictions on final score? Will there be stop all night?

No prediction, but I don’t expect a lot of defense from either team.

{ 1 comment }